LCM question -- how many packages of burgers and cheese slices to buy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulb203
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on solving a Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) problem involving cheese slices and burgers. The prime factorization of cheese slices (20 = 22 x 5) and burgers (12 = 22 x 3) leads to an LCM of 60. Consequently, 3 packets of cheese slices and 5 boxes of burgers are required. The problem's ambiguity is noted, as multiples of 60 (e.g., 120, 180, 240) could also satisfy the conditions, highlighting the need for clearer problem statements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lowest Common Multiple (LCM)
  • Basic knowledge of prime factorization
  • Familiarity with Venn diagrams for set representation
  • Ability to interpret mathematical problem statements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study methods for calculating LCM using prime factorization
  • Learn about the implications of ambiguous problem statements in mathematics
  • Explore applications of LCM in real-world scenarios, such as inventory management
  • Investigate alternative mathematical approaches to solving LCM problems
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone interested in mathematical problem-solving, particularly in the context of LCM and prime factorization.

paulb203
Messages
196
Reaction score
76
Homework Statement
Q. Rita is going to make some cheeseburgers for a party.
She buys some packets of cheese slices and some boxes of burgers.
There are 20 cheese slices in each packet.
There are 12 burgers in each box.
Rita buys exactly the same number of cheese slices and burgers.
How many packets of each does she buy?
Relevant Equations
N/A
My attempt at an answer. I’m pretty sure this is an LCM question (Lowest Common Multiple).

I started listing the prime factors for the cheese slices; 20 = 2^2 x 5

Then the burgers; 12 = 2^2 x 3

Then put the factors in a Venn diagram and found the LCM was 60

Then divided 60 by 20 for the cheese slices = 3 packets

Then divided 60 by 12 for the burgers = 5 boxes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct, and your question is?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
If you are in doubt about your work and final answer, you should always go back to the original problem statement and check if you answer works. It does.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
Incidentally, the problem as stated is ambiguous. 120, or 180, or 240, or any integer multiple of 60 will also work. Hopefully the original problem statement also says something like "the smallest number of packets she can buy", or "she knows she won't need more than 100" or something.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203, phinds and FactChecker
Ibix said:
Incidentally, the problem as stated is ambiguous. 120, or 180, or 240, or any integer multiple of 60 will also work. Hopefully the original problem statement also says something like "the smallest number of packets she can buy", or "she knows she won't need more than 100" or something.
Anything above 60 send by express mail to the PF lounge.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
phinds said:
Correct, and your question is?
Thanks, phinds.
My question is; is it correct? What about 6 packets and 10 boxes. Or 12 packets and 20 boxes. Etc, etc?

Q. Is the question badly worded?
 
FactChecker said:
If you are in doubt about your work and final answer, you should always go back to the original problem statement and check if you answer works. It does.
Thanks, FactChecker.
I did go back and check, but I'm wondering if my answer is correct or not. Could it not have been more packets and boxes?
 
Ibix said:
Incidentally, the problem as stated is ambiguous. 120, or 180, or 240, or any integer multiple of 60 will also work. Hopefully the original problem statement also says something like "the smallest number of packets she can buy", or "she knows she won't need more than 100" or something.
Thanks, Ibix. That's what I was wondering. As for the original problem statement; I've quoted it word for word.
 
paulb203 said:
Thanks, FactChecker.
I did go back and check, but I'm wondering if my answer is correct or not. Could it not have been more packets and boxes?
Yes. Any common multiple would literally answer that question. But they probably wanted you to give the least common multiple as you did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
  • #10
Surely two slices of cheese per burger: e.g here.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
  • #11
Ibix said:
Incidentally, the problem as stated is ambiguous.
Not if you include the title of the thread, which states it is a LCM question. Is the chapter of the book called LCM?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #12
Apropos of nothing.

Mark my words, the day will come when food product companies learn about prime numbers and start producing packages of 13 patties, 17 buns and 19 cheese slices. (Now the question becomes how many party-goers do you need to invite (or hire) to get all the burgers eaten.)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, paulb203 and phinds
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
Not if you include the title of the thread, which states it is a LCM question. Is the chapter of the book called LCM?
Ah, that wasn't part of the question.
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
Apropos of nothing.

Mark my words, the day will come when food product companies learn about prime numbers and start producing packages of 13 patties, 17 buns and 19 cheese slices. (Now the question becomes how many party-goers do you need to invite (or hire) to get all the burgers eaten.)
One of my favourite philosophers, Apropos of Nothing. Up there with Zeno of Elea.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, FactChecker, DaveC426913 and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K