Lemma 1.24 proof on left/right multiplication maps in Bresar

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiplication
2 replies · 2K views · last reply
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra" and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Finite Dimensional Division Algebras ... ...

I need help with the proof of Lemma 1.24 ...

Lemma 1.24 reads as follows:
Printed page showing Lemma 1.24 on linear independence of elements in a central simple algebra, followed by its proof with displayed equations involving sums of left and right multiplication maps.


My questions regarding the proof of Lemma 1.24 are as follows ... ...Question 1

In the above proof by Bresar, we read:

" ... ... Since ##A## is simple, the ideal generated by ##b_n## is equal to ##A##.

That is ##\sum_{ j = 1 }^m w_j b_n z_j = 1## for some ##w_j , z_J \in A##. ... ... "My question is ... ... how/why does the fact that the ideal generated by ##b_n## being equal to ##A## ...

imply that ... ##\sum_{ j = 1 }^m w_j b_n z_j = 1## for some ##w_j , z_J \in A## ...?

Question 2In the above proof by Bresar, we read:" ... ##0 = \sum_{ j = 1 }^m R_{ z_j } \ ( \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } R_{ b_i } ) \ R_{ w_j }####= \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } \ ( \sum_{ j = 1 }^m R_{ w_j b_i z_j } )####= \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } R_{ c_i }##... ... "
My questions are

(a) can someone help me to understand how##\sum_{ j = 1 }^m R_{ z_j } \ ( \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } R_{ b_i } ) \ R_{ w_j }####= \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } \ ( \sum_{ j = 1 }^m R_{ w_j b_i z_j } ) ##
(b) can someone help me to understand how##\sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } \ ( \sum_{ j = 1 }^m R_{ w_j b_i z_j } ) ####= \sum_{ i = 1 }^n L_{ a_i } R_{ c_i }##

Help will be appreciated ...

Peter

=========================================================================

*** NOTE ***So that readers of the above post will be able to understand the context and notation of the post ... I am providing Bresar's first two pages on Multiplication Algebras ... ... as follows:
Textbook page titled 1.5 Multiplication Algebra defining left and right multiplication maps L_a and R_b on an algebra A, with equations, Definition 1.22 of the multiplication algebra M(A), and Remark 1.23.

Printed page of mathematical text showing the proof of Lemma 1.24 on left and right multiplication maps in a simple algebra, with displayed equations involving sums, operators L and R, and coefficients c_i.
 
Attachments
  • Printed page showing Lemma 1.24 from Bresar's Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra, with its statement about linear independence of a_i and b_i, followed by a proof with displayed equations and a closing square symbol.
    Bresar - Lemma 1.24 ... ....png
    85.9 KB · Views: 798
  • Textbook page titled 1.5 Multiplication Algebra defining left and right multiplication maps L_a and R_b on an algebra A, with equations and Definition 1.22 of the multiplication algebra M(A).
    Bresar - 1 - Section 1.5 Multiplication Algebra - PART 1 ... ....png
    27.6 KB · Views: 723
  • Printed page of mathematical text showing the proof of Lemma 1.24 on left and right multiplication maps in a simple algebra, with displayed equations involving sums over L and R operators.
    Bresar - 2 - Section 1.5 Multiplication Algebra - PART 2 ... ....png
    29.5 KB · Views: 752
Last edited:
Q1:
What does it mean to be an ideal ##I## of ##A##?
For a (two-sided!) ideal, it has to hold, that ##A\cdot I \subseteq I## and ##I\cdot A \subseteq I##. Since ##b_n \in I##, we need to have all left and right multiples to also be in ##I##. So all elements of the form ##w_jb_nz_j## are together with ##b_n## also elements of ##I##.
Furthermore an ideal is closed under addition, so all summations of elements of ##I## are again in ##I##, esp. any sum ##\sum_{j=1}^{m} w_jb_nz_j##. This is simultaneously the most general form of any element of ##I = <b_n> = A\cdot I \cdot A##.

Q2:
We have ##\sum_{i=1}^{n} L_{a_i}R_{b_i} = 0 \; (^*) \;## by assumption.
Then let us define ##\sum_{j=1}^{m} w_jb_iz_j =: c_i \; (^{**}) \;##, simply as an abbreviation for these sums ##c_1, \ldots , c_n##.
Because all sums are finite, we won't have to bother any order of summation.
At last let us assume we have an arbitrary element ##x \in A##.

Now calculate ##\left( \sum_{j=1}^{m} R_{z_j} \left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} L_{a_i}R_{b_i} \right) R_{w_j} \right)(x)## by using ##(^*)## and ##(^{**})##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks again for your assistance, fresh_42 ...

Most helpful ...

Peter