I Linear Accelerator Length Contraction

Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary
Effect of relativistic length contraction on the electron bunches in a linear accelerator?
I am trying to understand the effect of relativistic length contraction on the electron bunches in a linear accelerator. Figure B is for nonrelativistic speeds, successive cylinder lengths are progressively longer. However, wikipedia says "At speeds near the speed of light, the incremental velocity increase will be small, with the energy appearing as an increase in the mass of the particles. In portions of the accelerator where this occurs, the tubular electrode lengths will be almost constant", so it should figure D or E. I expect length contraction to occur, therefore D. However, I don't see why the the gap between bunches does not contract.

Which option is right?

linac5.png

Red: electron bunches; grey: cylinders
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Orthoceras said:
Summary:: Effect of relativistic length contraction on the electron bunches in a linear accelerator?

However, I don't see why the the gap between bunches does not contract.
This has to do with how the acceleration is performed. The gap is not a rigid object (not that rigid objects exist in relativity) that maintains the same rest length. The setup is such that the distance between bunches in the instantaneous rest frame of a bunch increases during the process.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Back
Top