MHB Linear conqruence and relations problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mehdi98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Relations
mehdi98
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose that the relation R is defined on the set Z where aRb means a = ±b. Establish whether R is an equivalence relation giving your justifications.

Find the set of solutions of each of the linear congruence:
a) x ≡ 3 (mod 5).
b) 2x ≡ 5 (mod 9).(please write the full solutions thanks)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mehdi98 said:
Suppose that the relation R is defined on the set Z where aRb means a = ±b. Establish whether R is an equivalence relation giving your justifications.
R is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The fact that R is symmetric means $\forall x,y\in\mathbb{Z}\,(x,y)\in R\implies (y,x)\in R$. For this definition of $R$ this means that whenever $x=\pm y$, we also have $y=\pm x$. Do you think this is true?

mehdi98 said:
a) x ≡ 3 (mod 5).
It's easy to see that 3, 8, 13, 18, ... give 3 as a remainder when divided by 5. Therefore, solutions are $3+5k$, $k\in\mathbb{Z}$.

mehdi98 said:
b) 2x ≡ 5 (mod 9).
We need to divide both sides by 2. Note that 2 has an inverse modulo 9, i.e., there exists a number $y$ such that $2y$ gives the remainder 1 when divided by 9. Then $2xy\equiv x(2y)\equiv x\equiv 5y\pmod{9}$.

For the future, please read the http://mathhelpboards.com/rules/, especially rules 8 and 11.
 
thank you:D and sorry
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top