A Link between Kraus operators and PVMs

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter ueu
  • Start date Start date
ueu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Question about how to find kraus operators from a pvm that generates a given POVM:
can you always find two subsystems and an observable such that tracing out the result of the measurement over one of those subsystems you get the action of the Kraus operators that generates a given POVM?
I'm sorry if this discussion may be dumb.

Is this a way to find a family of kraus operators that generates a given POVM from a PVM?

Assume that you have a POVM given by the family of operators ##\{E_i\}_i##. Then it is possible to find a PVM that generates the given POVM by this procedure:
It is possible to find two subsystems S1 and S2 with spaces respectively ##\mathcal{H}_1## and ##\mathcal{H}_2## and an observable ##M## with spectral projectors ##\{P_k\}_k## and eigenvalues ##\lambda_i ##(let ##\Omega:=\bigcup_i \lambda_i##, let ##S## be the state space). Suppose for example that S2 is ancillary. Suppose moreover that the joint state of the system is ##\rho## and the reduced state of S1 is ##\rho_1=Tr_2(\rho)##.

##\forall i## the Kraus operators will then be defined by this action:
$$A_i: \frac{A_i\rho_1A_i^*}{Tr(A_i\rho_1A_i^*)}=Tr_2(\frac{\sum_{j\in J(i)} P_j \rho P_j}{Tr(\sum_{j\in J(i)} P_j \rho)}) $$

This must hold ##\forall \rho \in S,\rho_1=Tr_2(\rho)##.
Where ##J(i): J(i)\cap J(j)=\emptyset## ##\forall i\neq j##, ##\bigcup_i J(i)=\Omega## is a partition. (I ask for the existence of this partition because the cardinality of the family ##\{E_i\}_i## and of ##\{P_k\}_k## may be different so that we need to cluster some outcome together. I don't know if this is necessary)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top