Making a Particle Beam Cutter: Physics Perspective

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter acron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of creating a particle beam cutter, exploring its feasibility, potential designs, and comparisons with laser cutters. Participants examine the physics behind particle acceleration and the implications of using particle beams for cutting materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests building a powerful accelerator and emphasizes that beam current is more important than energy and particle type, questioning the overall purpose of such a device.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the practicality and cost-effectiveness of a particle beam cutter compared to laser cutters, highlighting safety issues associated with charged particle beams.
  • A suggestion is made to refer to existing technologies, such as focused ion beams, as examples of particle beam cutters.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the effects of breaking radiation on the cutting process, particularly with high-energy beams, while noting that certain materials might be suitable for this application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the viability or advantages of a particle beam cutter compared to traditional laser cutters, and multiple competing views regarding the practicality and safety of such a device remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the effectiveness of different particle types and the implications of using high-energy beams, but these assumptions are not fully explored or resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in particle physics, engineering applications of particle beams, and comparisons between cutting technologies may find this discussion relevant.

acron
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
How would one go about making a particle beam cutter? I'm thinking like a powerful laser type cutter.
Please no mechanical engineers, I want a purely physics point of view.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Build a powerful accelerator, use it (probably with a plasma window as exit). Beam current is more important than energy and particle type.
But where is the point?
 
mfb said:
Build a powerful accelerator, use it (probably with a plasma window as exit). Beam current is more important than energy and particle type.
But where is the point?
Any research I could look at or any links that you may be able to provide that can point me in the correct direction?
 
acron said:
How would one go about making a particle beam cutter? I'm thinking like a powerful laser type cutter.

Why use a particle beam cutter instead of the laser cutter? You get lots more cutting for much less money with the laser option (as opposed to a giant particle accelerator).

There is also a big safety issue with a charged particle beam cutter -- can you figure out what that may be?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
You could make something like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focused_ion_beam
This is a particle beam cutter. It cuts, it uses a particle beam.

Of course, could is more like "could" if you are talking about do it yourself.:)
 
The big problem seems to me that breaking radiation would mess up the cut, at least for high energy beams. Still, for the right materials (ones that don't harbor residual radiation) it should work. (A plasma cutter is an example of a low energy beam.) Water is a good substance.

Ice statue made with a particle beam anyone? A great centerpiece at your next party. :oldcool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K