Marko Rodin Fraud or not a Fraud?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magfluxfield
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around Marko Rodin's 'Rodin Coil', also referred to as the 'Flux Thruster Atom Pulsar', and the validity of his claims regarding vortex-based mathematics. Participants express skepticism about Rodin's theories, with one user planning to build and test a Rodin coil against standard toroidal coils to evaluate its performance. The conversation highlights a divide between those who view Rodin's work as potentially legitimate and others who dismiss it as crackpottery.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic coil design
  • Familiarity with vortex-based mathematics concepts
  • Knowledge of experimental testing methods in physics
  • Experience with toroidal coil applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of vortex-based mathematics
  • Learn about the construction and testing of electromagnetic coils
  • Investigate the scientific community's response to the Rodin Coil
  • Explore comparative studies between Rodin coils and traditional toroidal coils
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, hobbyists interested in electromagnetic theory, and anyone evaluating unconventional scientific claims.

magfluxfield
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Marko Rodin... Fraud or not a Fraud??

For all the people who know of the so called 'Rodin Coil', or, otherwise known (by Rodin Himself) as a 'Flux Thruster Atom Pulsar'. I would like to seek opinions on this work by people who skim this forum. The coil certainly has an interesting geometry, but after watching his video series on you tube (1 to 44) on his 'vortex based mathematics', I came to the conclusion that he is, well, abit of a nutter and I can't take him seriously. That said, I will be building a Rodin coil (once i have found a decent former) and thoughly testing it in the lab and comapring it to standard toroidal coils so see what the 'deal' actually is.

Please post your views, technical and non technical, It will be interesting to see a broad spectrum of responses.

Thanks,

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Come on?. If you have to ask if that is crackpot then something is certainly wrong.

In Before the Lock.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: osessica


bp_psy said:
Come on?. If you have to ask if that is crackpot then something is certainly wrong.

In Before the Lock.

I don't have to ask... I would like to know others opinions, that is all.
 


magfluxfield said:
I don't have to ask... I would like to know others opinions, that is all.

Read the forum rules. If you know that is crackpot don't post it.
 


Sorry! Just read the rules... No crackpottery.

Thanks for that, least i'll know for next time.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 204 ·
7
Replies
204
Views
40K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K