Mass Spectrometry Homework: Relative Abundance of S-32 & S-34

  • Thread starter Thread starter lkh1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relative isotopic abundance of sulfur isotopes S-32 and S-34 in mass spectrometry, specifically addressing a homework problem from the Wade Organic Chemistry textbook. The textbook states that the M+2 peak should be 4% of the M+ peak, while the lecturer claims it should be 104%. The consensus among participants leans towards the textbook being correct, as the ratio of S-32 to S-34 is 25:1, indicating that the M+2 peak should indeed be 4% of the M+ peak.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass spectrometry principles
  • Familiarity with isotopic abundance concepts
  • Knowledge of organic chemistry, particularly sulfur isotopes
  • Ability to interpret mass spectrometry graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of isotopic abundance in mass spectrometry
  • Study the interpretation of mass spectrometry graphs
  • Examine the differences between S-32 and S-34 in chemical reactions
  • Explore the Wade Organic Chemistry textbook for additional examples
USEFUL FOR

Students studying organic chemistry, particularly those focusing on mass spectrometry and isotopic analysis, as well as educators clarifying concepts related to sulfur isotopes.

lkh1986
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An organic compound contains some C and H atoms and 1 S atom. Element sulfur, S has 2 isotopes, S-32 ans S-34. Their relative isotopic abundance is 100:4 (or 25:1). On the mass spectrometry graph, how would the peak of M+2 compared to that of M+'s peak?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This is a question in Wade Organic Chemistry book. The answer given in the book is that the peak at M+2 is 4% of that of M+'s peak. However, my lecturer points out that the book is wrong. He says that the peak of M+2 should be 104% of that of M+'s peak. Who is correct?

I think the book is correct. Since the ratio of compound with S-32 and S-34 is 25:1. So I don't see any reason why we need to add 100 to that 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right. Are you sure you heard the lecturer correctly?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K