Mathematics Inspires Art: Aleph-1 and Goedel's Theorem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the intersection of mathematics and art, particularly focusing on concepts such as Aleph-1 and Gödel's Theorems. Participants explore the aesthetic qualities of mathematical expressions and the subjective nature of beauty in mathematics, as well as the implications of these ideas in artistic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share links to art inspired by mathematics, questioning whether mathematical symbols can be considered artistic.
  • One participant mentions a professor's work related to dynamical systems, suggesting that mathematical art can be appreciated by laypeople.
  • There is a discussion about the beauty of mathematical statements, with one participant expressing admiration for the elegance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem while challenging the artist's interpretation of it.
  • Another participant reflects on the relationship between form and meaning in mathematics, suggesting that beauty arises from a combination of simplicity and significance in statements.
  • Participants express a desire to protect their mathematical creations through copyright, humorously claiming ownership of specific mathematical symbols.
  • One participant argues that the beauty of mathematics is subjective and often requires experience to appreciate, contrasting the views of mathematicians and the general public.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the beauty of mathematics and its artistic representation, with no consensus reached on the subjective nature of beauty or the interpretation of Gödel's work.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying interpretations of Gödel's theorems and the subjective experience of beauty in mathematics, which may depend on individual backgrounds and knowledge levels.

matt grime
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
9,361
Reaction score
6
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/news/story/0,,1699203,00.html


story about and link to someone's mathematically inspired 'art' (if printing an equation or mathematical symbol is artistic to you).

be warned the descriptions of the equations/symbols can induce speechlessness and not in a good way (example. aleph-1 is "the smallest number bigger than infinity", and a logician might go a bit potty of the consistent/complete Goedel's theorem discussion)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first I thought you were talking about something one my prof creates using dynamical systems.

You can actually enjoy the work of my prof as a layman.

Having equations make you smart right?:wink:
 
I thought you were one of the 'euler's equation is great' party, which is what the artist is saying.
 
matt grime said:
a logician might go a bit potty of the consistent/complete Goedel's theorem discussion
I wouldn't consider myself a logician, but yeah
Godel discovered a property of any logical system that truly astounded mathematicians. He began by thinking about the way rules can be used to make statements. What Godel found was that if these rules contain no contradictions then there is something strange about the statements that can be made with them: certain statements cannot be proved true using the available rules, even though they are true. Instead extra rules are needed to prove the point. So the original set of rules must be incomplete.

Godel’s theorem is that if a set of rules are consistent, they are incomplete.
isn't correct. Someone should send the artist a picture of Gödel's Completeness Theorem. Hurkyl's given several nice explanations of Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem here if anyone's curious.

Actually, now that I think about it, I wonder what exactly makes statements like those beautiful. For example, there is something beautiful to me about

1) [tex]\Phi \models \phi \Leftrightarrow \Phi \vdash \phi[/tex]

It's certainly not because I think the font is pretty (though I suppose that might have some effect). At first, I think it's a combination of the statement's meaning and the simplicity with which it is stated. But I could state the same thing even simpler by saying

[tex]\clubsuit[/tex] =df (1).

But this doesn't make

2) [tex]\clubsuit[/tex]

beautiful -- or at least not nearly as much so as (1). Stating (1) in a more complex way also eventually removes at least some of the beauty -- all of the statements preceding (1) in the chapter together basically say what (1) says. Even its closest translation into English isn't as satifying.

3) An L-formula is a logical consequence of a set of L-formulas if and only if that L-formula is deducible from that set of L-formulas.

So it seems the relationship between form and meaning that gives rise to beauty isn't so simple, even in math and logic. Anywho, I just think that's interesting; the same thing is at work in poetry (in natural languages).
 
Last edited:
Oh my... There's actually a For Sale page.
 
devious_ said:
Oh my... There's actually a For Sale page.

Maybe we should start copyrighting our own creations to protect ourselves - just in case! :approve:
 
Tide said:
Maybe we should start copyrighting our own creations to protect ourselves - just in case! :approve:
I call dibs on [itex]\int[/itex]!
 
I want 0, in that case! Or perhaps 1...

I can kind of see what the author is saying - for example, I think that Stokes' Theorem stated in the language of differential forms is just fantastic:

[tex]\int_C d\omega = \int_{\partial C} \omega[/tex]

but that's more because of what it says, rather than how it looks. Although I do have to admit that it looks quite pwetty :)
 
I personally think the beauty of mathematics comes from experience in mathematics. similar to an artist, an experienced artist will see the inner beauty.

Things like equations won't be considered beautiful by the general public because they just don't know what it is. Some might say it's beautiful or cool, but just like in the world of artists, their opinion is meaningless to the mathematician or artist.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K