Matter/Anti-Matter in a Vacuum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between virtual particles and the expansion of space. Virtual particles, as defined in perturbative relativistic quantum field theory, do not influence the expansion of the universe, which is governed by the classical Einstein field equations of general relativity. The current understanding, encapsulated in the ##\Lambda\text{CDM}## model, indicates that while quantum field theory predicts particle production in an expanding universe, this effect is negligible and does not drive cosmological expansion. Thus, there is no evidence supporting the notion that virtual particles affect the expansion of space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbative relativistic quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Einstein's field equations in general relativity
  • Knowledge of the ##\Lambda\text{CDM}## model of cosmology
  • Basic concepts of virtual particles and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the ##\Lambda\text{CDM}## model on cosmological expansion
  • Explore the role of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Investigate current theories attempting to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity
  • Study particle production in quantum field theory on expanding backgrounds
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the interplay between quantum mechanics and general relativity, particularly in the context of cosmological expansion and virtual particles.

keeney123
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Question on the Energy produced and direction of that Energy.
I do not know if this is the place to post this. I am not a great physicist. Actually, I was an Electronic/Electrical Technician before I retired.

I learned that the vacuum of space is filled with matter/antimatter particles popping out of nothing and destroying themselves almost instantly.

My question is are these particles responsible for expanding space?
 
Space news on Phys.org
keeney123 said:
I learned that the vacuum of space is filled with matter/antimatter particles popping out of nothing and destroying themselves almost instantly.

My question is are these particles responsible for expanding space?
Virtual particles ("matter/antimatter particles popping out of nothing and destroying themselves almost instantly") are a feature of perturbative relativistic quantum field theory. In contrast, the expansion of the universe ("expanding space") is a feature of certain solutions to the classical Einstein field equations of general relativity. So the answer to your question is no, virtual particles are not responsible for the expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Vanadium 50
renormalize said:
Virtual particles ("matter/antimatter particles popping out of nothing and destroying themselves almost instantly") are a feature of perturbative relativistic quantum field theory. In contrast, the expansion of the universe ("expanding space") is a feature of certain solutions to the classical Einstein field equations of general relativity. So the answer to your question is no, virtual particles are not responsible for the expansion.
Thank You for your response.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and berkeman
Am I correct that these Virtual particles can affect photons?
 
renormalize said:
Virtual particles ("matter/antimatter particles popping out of nothing and destroying themselves almost instantly") are a feature of perturbative relativistic quantum field theory. In contrast, the expansion of the universe ("expanding space") is a feature of certain solutions to the classical Einstein field equations of general relativity. So the answer to your question is no, virtual particles are not responsible for the expansion.
Can you elaborate?

There are two theories (I presume currently incompatible because they on opposite sides the the QM/Einsteinian paradox) but that doesn't mean that the effects described don't actually exist.

I think it's like saying "They can't be brothers! This one's farm is in Hatfield territory and that one's farm is in McCoy territory." as if domicile location can inform heredity.

It seems to me - in my poorly-informed education - that the answer to this question has to wait until the we can reconcile QM and Einsteinian GR. For all we know, this umbrella theory could connect expansion and virtual particles - we can't say until have it.

Am I wrong on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Motore
DaveC426913 said:
Am I wrong on this?
I think so. The current classical ##\Lambda\text{CDM}## model, even with its shortcomings, comports with the bulk of the evidence for cosmological expansion. Looking at QFT on the expanding background does predict particle production, but at a rate far too small to significantly affect the classical predictions. Any suggestion that an eventual quantum gravity might replace the current understanding, that expansion is due to the interaction of classical gravity with matter, radiation and the cosmological constant, by an expansion that is somehow caused by virtual particles, is entirely speculative at this time. All we can say with certainty is that there is currently no evidence that virtual particles affect cosmological expansion, let alone drive it.
 
renormalize said:
I think so. The current classical ##\Lambda\text{CDM}## model, even with its shortcomings, comports with the bulk of the evidence for cosmological expansion. Looking at QFT on the expanding background does predict particle production, but at a rate far too small to significantly affect the classical predictions. Any suggestion that an eventual quantum gravity might replace the current understanding, that expansion is due to the interaction of classical gravity with matter, radiation and the cosmological constant, by an expansion that is somehow caused by virtual particles, is entirely speculative at this time. All we can say with certainty is that there is currently no evidence that virtual particles affect cosmological expansion, let alone drive it.
Ah. That answer gives me the warm and fuzzies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: renormalize

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K