A Method of calculating the vacuum energy divergence

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curved space Qft
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of vacuum energy divergence for scalar fields in quantum field theory, specifically referencing a method involving the continuation of the dimension parameter n away from integer values. This approach is part of dimensional regularization, which temporarily makes divergent quantities finite. The integral provided can be evaluated using properties of Beta and Gamma functions, but confusion arises regarding the meaning of continuing n away from integral values. The clarification indicates that this technique is standard in renormalization processes. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping the underlying principles of dimensional regularization in quantum field theory.
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR
When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
In the book, quantum fields in curved space, when calculating the vacuum energy divergence for scalar fields, it reads:
$$\sum_{\mathbf k}\omega/2=(L^2/4\pi)^{(n-1)/2}\frac 1 {\Gamma ((n-1)/2)} \int_0^\infty (k^2+m^2)^{1/2}k^{n-2}dk .$$ This divergence can be usefully analyzed by performing the integral with ##n## continued away from integral values to obtain $$-L^{n-1}2^{-n-1}\pi^{-n/2}m^n \Gamma(-n/2).$$

I could get the answer by letting ##k=m\tan t ## and using the properties of Beta functions and Gamma functions, but I still do not understand what it means by saying "with ##n## continued away from integral values".

Thanks ahead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
TL;DR Summary: When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
Just after your quotation from pg. 16 of Birrell & Davies, Quantum field theory in curved space, it states:
"This method of temporarily making divergent quantities finite by continuing the dimension of spacetime away from integer values forms the basis of dimensional regularization (see chapter 6)."
What don't you understand about this explanation? Are you familiar with dimensional regularization?
 
Thanks, @renormalize. I mistakenly thought the integral value was somehow related to the integration in the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes renormalize
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...