A Method of calculating the vacuum energy divergence

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curved space Qft
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
In the book, quantum fields in curved space, when calculating the vacuum energy divergence for scalar fields, it reads:
$$\sum_{\mathbf k}\omega/2=(L^2/4\pi)^{(n-1)/2}\frac 1 {\Gamma ((n-1)/2)} \int_0^\infty (k^2+m^2)^{1/2}k^{n-2}dk .$$ This divergence can be usefully analyzed by performing the integral with ##n## continued away from integral values to obtain $$-L^{n-1}2^{-n-1}\pi^{-n/2}m^n \Gamma(-n/2).$$

I could get the answer by letting ##k=m\tan t ## and using the properties of Beta functions and Gamma functions, but I still do not understand what it means by saying "with ##n## continued away from integral values".

Thanks ahead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
TL;DR Summary: When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
Just after your quotation from pg. 16 of Birrell & Davies, Quantum field theory in curved space, it states:
"This method of temporarily making divergent quantities finite by continuing the dimension of spacetime away from integer values forms the basis of dimensional regularization (see chapter 6)."
What don't you understand about this explanation? Are you familiar with dimensional regularization?
 
Thanks, @renormalize. I mistakenly thought the integral value was somehow related to the integration in the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes renormalize
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top