MHB Modeling Relationships in a Supermarket: ER Model with Cardinalities

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! 😊

In a supermarket, there are the following relationships: For each employee (Angestellter), there are employee numbers (AngNr), last name (Name), first name (Vorname), address (Adresse) and department (Abteilung) known. Each employee works in exactly one department. Of each department knows their name (Name), their employees (Angestellte), the responsible manager (Manager) and the items (Artikel) offered.
An item can be offered in several departments. Description (Bezeichnung), supplier (Lieferant), sales price (Verkaufspreis) and an article number (Artikelnummer) assigned by the supplier as well as by the supermarket. From each supplier the name (Name), address (Adresse) and items (Artikel) delivered to the supermarket with delivery prices are known. An article is supplied by exactly one supplier, but can be supplied at different prices.

Represent these relationships in an ER model with cardinalities and define suitable ones key attributes.Does this mean that we have to make a graph with how these attributes are related ? :unsure:

Do we have the attributes employee, department, article, supplier ? :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
So far I have done the following :
1643740958824.png


Is that correct so far? :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top