Modified Einstein E=MC^2/∆T: Physical Meaning & Applications

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter khalid.mostafa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a modified interpretation of Einstein's equation E=mc², specifically the formulation E=mc²/∆T. Participants explore the physical meaning of this equation, its implications regarding the conversion of energy and mass over time, and potential applications. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and challenges to the proposed ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that energy takes time to convert into mass and vice versa, suggesting that the universe's mass must increase over time due to a constant initial energy transforming into mass.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the equation, noting that energy divided by time represents power, not energy, and challenges the connection to universal laws.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on the physical meaning of the proposed equation and its implications, reiterating the idea of energy and mass conversion over time.
  • Concerns are raised about the unknown total energy and mass of the universe, questioning the basis for the claims made about mass increase.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity and implications of the modified equation. There is no consensus on the physical meaning or the correctness of the claims made about energy and mass conversion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the understanding of energy and mass relationships, particularly regarding the assumptions made about time intervals and the unknowns in the total energy and mass of the universe.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in theoretical physics, the implications of Einstein's equations, and discussions on energy-mass conversion may find this thread relevant.

khalid.mostafa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
E=MC^2/ ∆T
E ----- (Watt) M ------- (kg) c -------- (3* 108 m/s2) ∆T ------ (second)

Physical meaning:-
The energy take time to convert into mass and mass take time to convert into energy
So the universe mass must increase every second
Because of the initial energy is constant and it transform into mass by time pass .

Application of eq:-
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
{وَالسَّمَاء بَنَيْنَاهَا بِأَيْدٍ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ} (سورة الذاريات:47)
"And the heaven we constructed with strength and indeed we are its expanders"
صدق الله العظيم
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a question or a statement? If it is a statement, do you have a reference to where it comes from? Also please note that personal theories are not allowed here (see guidelines). If it is a question, where's the question?
 
it is not personal theories it just convert the eq from work formal to energy formal by divided on ∆T
and i ask about Physical meaning ? is it true ??:-
The energy take time to convert into mass and mass take time to convert into energy
So the universe mass must increase every second
Because of the initial energy is constant and it transform into mass by time pass .
 
khalid.mostafa, welcome to Physics Forums, by the way! :smile:

Energy divided by time is not energy, it's Power (so your equation above does not make sense - the left hand side equals energy, the right hand side equals power).
khalid.mostafa said:
The energy take time to convert into mass and mass take time to convert into energy
Possibly (but ΔT would be very small for small particle systems). But how does this translate to any universal "law" for the Universe? I can't see any connection.
khalid.mostafa said:
So the universe mass must increase every second
Why?
khalid.mostafa said:
Because of the initial energy is constant...
Ok, let's assume this.
khalid.mostafa said:
...and it transform into mass by time pass .
Why? How? Who has said so? :confused:
I also should point out that the total energy and the total mass of the entire Universe is unknown.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad E=mc^2 and acceleration
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
High School The relationship between mc^2 and mc^2 x 1/2
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Undergrad Can one get E=mc^2 using classical EM theory?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Uncovering a Decent Proof of E=mc^2
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Undergrad Was Einstein's Proof of E=MC^2 Flawed?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
High School Where did the 1/2 go in E=mc^2?
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K
High School Why Isn't Work Equal to Einstein's E=mc²?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Relativistic Uniform Circular Motion
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
High School How to simply solve for E=MC^2?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Undergrad Need a practical example of E=mc^2 with real numbers
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K