Nature Magazine assesses candidates on science

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter D H
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nature magazine conducted an assessment of the 2008 Presidential candidates' positions on key science and technology issues, specifically climate change, stem cell research, and space exploration. The analysis highlighted a general lack of scientific background among the candidates, with many resorting to humor rather than substantive discussion on these topics. Notably, the juxtaposition of Biden's quote following Richardson's created an impression of absurdity in their responses. The assessment serves as a critical resource for understanding the candidates' stances on important scientific matters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of climate change policies
  • Familiarity with stem cell research implications
  • Knowledge of space exploration initiatives
  • Awareness of political discourse surrounding science and technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest developments in climate change legislation
  • Explore the ethical considerations of stem cell research
  • Investigate current U.S. space exploration programs and their objectives
  • Analyze the impact of political humor on public perception of science
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political analysts, science communicators, and voters interested in the intersection of science and policy during election cycles.

D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
15,524
Reaction score
769
The Presidential candidates have largely ignored science and technology so far. Nonetheless, Nature magazine took itself to task to compare and contrast the various candidates stands on three science and technology issues: climate, stem cell research, and space. Their assessment is http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080102/images/451004a-i1.0_large.jpg".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the notable quotes, unfortunate placement of Biden's quote immediately after Richardson. It sounded as if Richardson was confirming he was full of compressed air by emitting some of it while standing next to Biden.

I don't any of the candidates have much of a scientific background. Except for climate, energy, and stem cell research, most try to fall back on humorous comments (Huckabee's comments on sending Hillary to Mars, for example).
 
Thanks for this link. I tried to find a couple of candidates views on science recently with little success.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
806
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K