Negative Absolute Temperature: Defying Gravity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tollendal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Nature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Dr. Achim Rosch's research at the University of Cologne introduces the concept of negative absolute temperature, demonstrating that atoms in this state can exhibit upward movement, seemingly defying gravity. This phenomenon challenges traditional notions of gravity being solely attractive and suggests a new fundamental limit in nature, akin to the speed of light. The discussion references several key papers, including those published in Nature and Physical Review Letters, which provide foundational insights into the implications of negative temperature and its historical context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of negative absolute temperature concepts
  • Familiarity with the standard model of gravity
  • Knowledge of condensed matter physics
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature, particularly in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative absolute temperature in quantum mechanics
  • Study the Hubbard model and its relevance to particle behavior in optical lattices
  • Examine the historical context of negative temperature in scientific literature
  • Explore the relationship between temperature and fundamental limits in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in condensed matter physics, and anyone interested in the implications of negative absolute temperature and its effects on gravity and particle behavior.

Tollendal
Messages
47
Reaction score
8
Dr. Achim Rosch, a theoretical physicist at the University of Cologne in Germany, who proposed the technique used by Dr. Ulrich Schneider and his team to create in laboratory negative absolute temperature, have calculated that whereas clouds of atoms would normally be pulled downwards by gravity, if part of the cloud is at a negative absolute temperature, some atoms will move upwards, apparently defying gravity.

The matter is still under debate, but in my view it's no more certain to affirmate that gravity is only atractive: one ought to suspend judgement until peer review goes ahead.

Interesting enough, but in my view the most relevant thing about the new research is that it seems to establish a new fundamental limit in Nature, somewhat analogous to c. Absolute zero temperature can't be reached, but can be surpassed!

See also:

Nature
doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12146

Braun, S. et al. Science 339, 52–55 (2013).

Medley, P., Weld, D. M., Miyake, H., Pritchard, D. E. & Ketterle, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 195301 (2011).

Rapp, A., Mandt, S. & Rosch, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220405 (2010).

Mandt, S., Rapp, A. & Rosch, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250602 (2011).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you actually read the references?
If you do, you will see that the effect described is predicted by using the standard model for gravity. So it does not allow to draw any conclusion about some exotic, unknown yet, behavior of gravity.
See the PhysRevLett paper.
 
Dear nasu,

I thank you very much your kind observation. In my view the most relevant thing about the new research is that it seems to establish a new fundamental limit in Nature, somewhat analogous to c. Absolute zero temperature can't be reached, but can be surpassed! I'm transposing this discussion to a new tread: "A new limit in Nature".
 
Some of the titles in the science media may give you the wrong idea about the "new" part.
The concept of negative temperature is quite old. I can find papers from 1950s mentioning the concept. Probably is older than that.
So if it is a "fundamental limit", it is not so new.
If you want to call it this and make an analogy with speed of light, is your choice. I don't see the relevance though.
 
Tollendal said:
In my view the most relevant thing about the new research is that it seems to establish a new fundamental limit in Nature, somewhat analogous to c. Absolute zero temperature can't be reached, but can be surpassed! I'm transposing this discussion to a new tread: "A new limit in Nature".

If you are not able to read the Phys Rev Lett 2011 article, I recommend reading the ArXiv article (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.3545.pdf). Aside from T < 0 not being a 'new fundamental limit', the Hubbard model contains more than simply gravity- it's not correct to claim that particles 'fall up', especially since the T < 0 particles are at the bottom of the cloud. It's not clear from the articles, but it appears that this system also realizes a Brownian ratchet.

To summarize: fermions in an optical lattice are a very interesting model system, displaying many unique and novel features that provide broad relevance to condensed matter.
 
Tollendal said:
somewhat analogous to c. Absolute zero temperature can't be reached, but can be surpassed!
In addition to the other comments, this seems to be a misunderstanding of c. Photons and other massless particles do reach c, but there are no known real particles that surpass it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K