New mentors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frabjous
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
PF has lost six mentors since 2018, with only one returning mentor added recently, raising concerns about the need for new mentors. The current mentor workload has increased, but the existing core group is viewed as highly effective, supported by improved PF software and tools that assist in moderation. The presence of a larger group of Advisors has enhanced moderation discussions, making tasks more efficient. Although there are discussions about potentially adding new mentors, such decisions typically occur within the Mentor forums rather than the Feedback forum. Overall, the community acknowledges the importance of maintaining quality mentorship while managing the evolving dynamics of the platform.
Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,952
Reaction score
2,381
Assuming I have not missed anyone, PF has lost 6 mentors since 2018 and the only new mentor was one who returned. Will we be seeing any new mentors soon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which section do you think it's not moderated enough? Remember, this is an unpaid job, and because of the "mentor" hat, the moderator needs to be a very knowledgeable person who is willing to spend time daily here not only cleaning up junk, but encouraging valuable discussions.
 
dextercioby said:
Which section do you think it's not moderated enough? Remember, this is an unpaid job, and because of the "mentor" hat, the moderator needs to be a very knowledgeable person who is willing to spend time daily here not only cleaning up junk, but encouraging valuable discussions.
Fewer mentors generally means more work load per mentor. There are fewer mentors than there were in 2018. Or are you implying that PF is shrinking or that the task is easier today?

I also have a vague concern about a lack of new blood.
 
Frabjous said:
Fewer mentors generally means more work load per mentor. There are fewer mentors than there were in 2018.
It's a bit more complicated than that, IMO.

First, the core group of Mentors we have right now is really amazing. We've had lots of great Mentors over the years, but I think that the group we have right now is the best ever. Second, the current PF software gives us a lot of Mentoring tools that we did not have back a few years ago. The PF AI catches a lot of stuff for us and puts questionable posts "in Moderation" (hidden) and flags us to take a look.

Third, we have a larger group of Advisors now (Science Advisors, Homework Helpers, Staff Emeritus, etc.) that help us with Moderation discussions in the private Advisor forums, and the Mentors really value those discussions.

And I think over the years we've been able to do a better job of tuning up the PF rules and enforcing them, so new PF users pretty quickly understand what is expected of them here, and anything posted outside of the rules gets reported pretty quickly. That is a huge help, and helps to make the Mentoring tasks much more efficient.

I'm not saying that we may not want to add a new Mentor or two in the near future, but those types of discussions generally are had in the Mentor forums and not in the Feedback forum. Thanks for asking, though. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Wrichik Basu, BillTre and 5 others

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top