No big planets close to the Sun?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter verdigris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the absence of large rocky planets in the inner solar system, contrasting them with the presence of gaseous giants. Participants explore theories regarding planetary formation, the composition of the solar nebula, and the implications of these factors on the current structure of the solar system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that there may not have been enough building material to form large rocky planets, suggesting that even the combined mass of all rocky bodies in the solar system is insufficient compared to Jupiter.
  • Others argue that the presence of gaseous giants implies that rocky cores could have existed in their places, and that these cores may have been blown away when the Sun ignited.
  • A later reply questions why the Sun would not have the largest and rockiest core, suggesting that the intense conditions in the core might keep it in a gaseous state.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility that gas giants could have started at smaller sizes and captured gas from the solar nebula, which was blown away by the Sun's ignition.
  • There is mention of extrasolar planets, with some being classified as brown dwarfs, and the limitations of current instruments in detecting Earth-sized planets.
  • One participant highlights the discovery of exo-solar planets with masses less than Earth's, indicating a diversity in planetary types beyond the solar system.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the specifics of planetary formation and the characteristics of exo-solar planets, including the timing of future telescopes designed to find Earth-sized planets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the formation of planets and the implications of the solar nebula's composition. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the reasons for the absence of large rocky planets.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the solar nebula's composition, the definitions of planetary types, and the unresolved nature of some claims about exo-solar planets.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in planetary formation, the structure of the solar system, and the characteristics of exo-solar planets may find this discussion relevant.

verdigris
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
No big rocky planets?

Why are there no big rocky planets - all the big planets are gaseous.
Did big rocky planets get smashed up and end up in the Kuiper belt?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
verdigris said:
Why are there no big rocky planets - all the big planets are gaseous.
Did big rocky planets get smashed up and end up in the Kuiper belt?

There simply wasn't enough building material to make large rocky planets. Even if you put all the rocky bodies in the Solar System together, it wouldn't even come close to matching the mass of Jupiter.
 
Well, that plus if there weren't big gaseous planets, there'd be rocky ones in their places - all the giant gaseous planets are believed to have large rocky cores. So maybe a better question would be: why don't the rocky cores in the inner solar system have gaseous planets around them? The answer would be that it was blown away when the sun ignited.

The atmospheric proportions of hydrogen and helium are very close to the theoretical composition of the primordial solar nebula.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter

So, it is reasonable to assume that its fraction of heavier elements is also pretty close to the amount in the original primordial solar nebula.

Here's what they think about the core:
There is still some uncertainty regarding the interior structure of Jupiter. One model shows a homogeneous model with no solid surface; the density may simply increase gradually toward the core. Alternatively Jupiter may possesses a dense, rocky core with a mass of up to twelve times the Earth's total mass; roughly 3% of the total mass.[21][18] The core region is surrounded by dense metallic hydrogen, which extends outward to about 78% of the radius of the planet.[18] Above lies a transparent interior atmosphere of liquid hydrogen and gaseous hydrogen, with the gaseous portion extending downward from the cloud layer to a depth of about 1,000 km.[18] There may be no clear boundary or surface between these different phases of hydrogen; the conditions blend smoothly from gas to liquid as one descends.[22][23]

The temperature and pressure inside Jupiter increase steadily toward the core. At the phase transition region where hydrogen becomes metallic, the temperature is believed to be 10,000 K and the pressure is 200 GPa. The temperature at the core boundary is estimated to be 36,000 K and the interior pressure is roughly 3,000–4,500 GPa.[18]
 
Last edited:
Jupiter and the gas planets started out at the size of Earth originally, and when the sun blew out most of the nebula when it started nuclear fusion, the outer planets captured a lot of this gas, and thus, that is the reason why they are so big, and also, I believe that the nebula was mostly in the outer regions... I'll need to check up on that.

The reason why some extrasolar planets are gas giants is because they are brown dwarfs, and never became stars, even though some are as much as 5 times bigger than Jupiter, and our instruments so far are not sensitive enough to find Earth sized planets.

Btw, when is that telescope for finding Earth sized planets going to be launched?
 
russ_watters said:
Well, that plus if there weren't big gaseous planets, there'd be rocky ones in their places - all the giant gaseous planets are believed to have large rocky cores. So maybe a better question would be: why don't the rocky cores in the inner solar system have gaseous planets around them? The answer would be that it was blown away when the sun ignited.

Shouldn't the Sun have the largest and rockiest core of all?
 
MadScientist 1000 said:
The reason why some extrasolar planets are gas giants is because they are brown dwarfs, and never became stars, even though some are as much as 5 times bigger than Jupiter, and our instruments so far are not sensitive enough to find Earth sized planets.
Umm, I'm not sure about that. "PSR B1257+12 A" is an exo-solar planet with a mass that is LESS than the Earth's (it's only 2x lunar mass).

But that's not all. A possible comet/asteroid may have also been discovered in the same pulsar system that has an UPPER mass limit of 0.0004 Earths!

Exo-solar planets that are less than 8x Earth mass have also been discovered about main-sequence stars.

Btw, when is that telescope for finding Earth sized planets going to be launched?

There are several with similar mission statements. There was one launched in december, the French-led Corot mission.

Then there are the James Webb Telescope, the Terrestrial Planet Finder (launch around 2015), or the Kepler mission (scheduled launch in October 2008).
 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
Shouldn't the Sun have the largest and rockiest core of all?

Why do you say that? I would think the intense temperature and pressure in the core would keep it in a gaseous state. Although the core does rotates as a solid body.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K