I just read this as I was skimming over the preface of a relativistic QM book. My question is this; is it the case that there is not yet a logically consistent and complete relativistic quantum theory or is this statement just because the book was published in 1980 and there has since been progress made?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# No logically consistent relativistic quantum theory?

Loading...

Similar Threads for logically consistent relativistic | Date |
---|---|

B What does the 'space' inside an atom consist of? | Apr 15, 2018 |

B Does Quantum Physics really defy logic? | May 9, 2016 |

A Shocker: PR Box is logically inconsistent | Feb 8, 2016 |

Delayed choice as a quantum logic circuit | Aug 20, 2015 |

Possible Logical Flaw in Sakurai | Jan 6, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**