NY Times: Predatory Journals - Sting

  • Thread starter Thread starter diogenesNY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Journals
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The New York Times article discusses the implications of predatory journals, highlighting a sting operation where a fictitious author, Anna O. Szust, submitted fake publications to expose the vulnerabilities in open access publishing. The operation revealed that numerous journals accepted her fraudulent submissions without proper vetting. This investigation draws parallels to a previous sting conducted by a journalist for Science, which tested the acceptance of a flawed study by various journals. The findings underscore the need for greater scrutiny in the academic publishing landscape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open access publishing models
  • Familiarity with academic peer review processes
  • Knowledge of predatory journal characteristics
  • Awareness of academic integrity issues
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the criteria for identifying predatory journals
  • Explore the impact of open access publishing on academic integrity
  • Learn about the role of peer review in scholarly publishing
  • Investigate tools for assessing journal quality, such as Beall's List
USEFUL FOR

Academics, researchers, and students interested in understanding the challenges posed by predatory journals and the importance of maintaining integrity in scholarly publishing.

diogenesNY
Messages
230
Reaction score
259
New York Times article on open access journals, good and bad, and an academic sting operation with interesting results.
------------------------------------------------------

A Scholarly Sting Operation Shines a Light on ‘Predatory’ Journals
By GINA KOLATA MARCH 22, 2017

The applicant’s nom de plume was not exactly subtle, if you know Polish. The middle initial and surname of the author, Anna O. Szust, mean “fraudster.” Her publications were fake and her degrees were fake. The book chapters she listed among her publications could not be found, but perhaps that should not have been a surprise because the book publishers were fake, too.

...article continues...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/science/open-access-journals.html?_r=0

Of interest.

diogenesNY
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo and OmCheeto
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the original news piece from Nature that the NY Times piece is summarizing: http://www.nature.com/news/predatory-journals-recruit-fake-editor-1.21662

The piece was inspired by a previous sting operation in which a journalist for Science sent a clearly flawed scientific study to various journals to see which ones would accept it: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60
(popular press summary in case you cannot access the science piece: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2013/oct/04/open-access-journals-fake-paper)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo, OmCheeto and diogenesNY
Interesting that it got international fame, in my my circles in Poland it got some attention - sadly, many people misunderstood it as proving the peer reviewed science is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K