O-ring groove specifications and questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jynx18
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design specifications for an O-ring groove intended to provide friction between two hollow tubes, rather than for sealing purposes. Participants explore various design considerations, including groove dimensions and alternative methods to achieve the desired frictional grip.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines specific dimensions for the O-ring and groove based on the Parker handbook, suggesting a groove depth of 0.050" to 0.052" and a groove width of 0.093" to 0.098".
  • Another participant provides links to additional resources for O-ring groove design, indicating that further research may be beneficial.
  • A participant emphasizes that the O-ring must be sufficiently deformed to create the necessary friction and suggests measuring the required deformation to determine appropriate groove dimensions.
  • One participant questions the necessity of using an O-ring for friction and proposes the use of a spring-energized solution to better control friction levels.
  • Another participant expresses the need for the O-ring to help center the tubes and is open to alternative methods for achieving this alignment.
  • A later reply discusses the effects of lubrication on the O-ring's performance and suggests that a polished surface can reduce wear, while also addressing the potential for the O-ring to pinch in the groove.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the design and necessity of the O-ring for friction, with no consensus reached on the best approach or specific dimensions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal design choices.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions regarding the deformation of the O-ring, the impact of lubrication, and the potential for wear, but these aspects remain unresolved and depend on specific application conditions.

Jynx18
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am looking for some info. I have two hollow tubes that need to slide into each other and have the inside one not fall out due to friction from the oring INSIDE the larger one. It is not doing any sealing, the oring is just to cause friction. The inside tube will be moved to remove and replace it but it is not a constantly moving part. The tube diameters and oring size are set. I just need to size the groove for the oring to sit in.

Oring
Size: 018
ID: 0.739"
OD: 0.879"
Cross section: 0.07"

Tube 1:
0.75" ID

Tube 2:
0.74" OD

Tube 2 goes inside Tube 1.

From the parker handbook it looks like the oring groove should be slightly wider than the oring. Also to keep some friction the OD of the groove should be slightly smaller than the OD of the oring.

Here is what I am thinking from the handbook:

It says Gland Depth sould be 0.050" to 0.052".

So 0.75" + 0.050" + 0.050" = 0.85" to 0.854"

Groove Diameter: 0.85" to 0.854"

And right from the handbook:
Groove Width: 0.093" to 0.098" (sounds a little wide to me though)

Any input on design of this would be great. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You want a frictional grip rather than a fluid seal so hydraulic data will be misleading since fluid must move around the O-ring to pressure seal.

The O-ring must be deformed sufficiently to apply the friction you require.

The volume of the O-ring is fixed. If not under tension the O-ring will have a fixed cross section. Deformation into a flat sided ellipse will require a groove width that does not pinch the O-ring.

1. Investigate the flattening needed to grip OK between cylinders. O-ring grip thickness = t.
2. Measure the O-ring width in that situation. Width = w.
3. Machine a grove of width w and depth t.

Tolerance will be taken up by filling the unused corners of the groove.
 
If all you are interested in is friction, why use an Oring at all?

Use something spring energized, that way you can control the level of friction.
 
I also need that the oring kind of centers the tube but am open to other methods. What would you recommend?
 
The great thing about deformation of a partially constrained rubber cross section is that it is elastic, just like a spring.

Unfortunately, water is a natural lubricant of rubber. The coefficient of friction will depend on the (water / oil / dry) state of the contact. If not lubricated, a dry friction surface may gall the rubber seal. Abrasive wear can be reduced by the use of a polished stainless steel or a chrome plated sliding surface. If grit is present it will become embedded in the rubber which will wear the metal sliding surface faster than the softer rubber.

One problem with O-ring seals is that they get pushed into, or pinched in, the small gap between the piston and cylinder. O-ring hoop tension can be used in the absence of fluid pressure by cutting the groove for the O-ring with a deeper dovetail section, axial pressure will then tend to lift the O-ring away from the friction surface. That can significantly reduce galling of the rubber and sensitivity to lubrication.