Use the orthogonality relation of Bessel function to argue whether the following two integrals are zero or not:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(x)xJ_2(x)dx[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(k_1x)J_1(k_2x)dx[/itex], where [tex]k_1,k_2[/tex] are two distinct zeros of Bessel function of order 1.

The textbook we are using is Boas's Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, so the formulas that are available to us are a set of recursion relations of Bessel function, and the orthogonality relations between Bessel function of the same order: http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/d/b/cdb1e8ba98f7855eba9777024cce03fd.png.

For the first integral, the two Bessel functions are of different order, and there is no zeros in the arguments of the two functions, so I have no idea how to link the first integral to the orthogonality relation of Bessel functions.

For the second integral, my argument is that since [itex]\displaystyle\int_0^1J_1(k_1x)xJ_1(k_2x)dx[/itex] is zero, the 2nd integral (note that there is no x between the two Bessel function) cannot be zero. I think this argument is quite weak. Would anyone give me a better argument?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# On Bessel function's orthogonality

Loading...

Similar Threads - Bessel function's orthogonality | Date |
---|---|

B Bessel Function of 1st and 2nd Kind | Jun 26, 2016 |

I Limit of spherical bessel function of the second kind | Mar 1, 2016 |

Orthogonality relations for Hankel functions | May 15, 2015 |

Bessel Functions | Oct 21, 2014 |

Bessel Function, Orthogonality and More | Apr 20, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**