Order of group, Order of element

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of groups generated by two elements, specifically focusing on the order of the group and the order of its elements. Participants explore various examples and theorems related to group theory, including commutation relations and the implications for group structure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the largest group that can be formed by generators ##a## and ##b## given their orders ##n## and ##m##.
  • One participant suggests that the group can be represented as a quotient of the free group on ##\{a,b\}##.
  • Another participant notes that without commutation relations, the group is infinite.
  • Several participants provide examples to illustrate their points, including specific relations like ##a^2=e## and ##b^3=3##, and discuss the implications of these relations.
  • There is a proposal that a group defined by the relations ##a^{4}=b^{4}=e## and ##aba=b## should be noncommutative, raising questions about its order.
  • One participant refers to the quaternion group and its relation to the discussed group structures.
  • Another participant mentions that if commutativity holds, the order of the group can be calculated as ##nm##, where ##n## and ##m## are the orders of the generators.
  • There is a reference to a source discussing groups of order 16, noting the existence of multiple nonisomorphic groups with specific properties.
  • Participants express difficulty in determining the order of the group based on the relations provided, highlighting the complexity of the problem.
  • One participant discusses constructing the Cayley table and the implications of the relation ##aba = b## on the group structure.
  • Another participant introduces an example involving signed permutation matrices and discusses the subgroup generated by specific elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and examples, indicating that there is no consensus on the specific group structures or orders being discussed. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the implications of commutativity and the specific examples provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of determining group orders based on the given relations, with references to Lagrange's theorem and the potential for multiple non-Abelian groups of the same order. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the relations between the generators.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
If group ##(G,\cdot)## is defined with two generators ##a## and ##b##. And ##a^n=e##, ##b^{m}=e##. Is there any Theorem to tell us what is the largest group they can form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the group ##\langle a,b\mid a^n = e, b^m = e \rangle##, which is a quotient of the free group on ##\{a,b\}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler
... and without any commutation relations, this is an infinite group.
 
I do not understand. For instance let take example ##a^2=e##, ##b^3=3##, ##aba=b##. Could you explain me on that example?
 
LagrangeEuler said:
I do not understand. For instance let take example ##a^2=e##, ##b^3=3##, ##aba=b##. Could you explain me on that example?
Sure. ##aba=b \Longrightarrow ab=ba^{-1}=ba ## hence we have a commutative group. Now ##\langle a \rangle \times \langle b \rangle = \mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_3= \mathbb{Z}_6##.
 
Great. Interesting. You easily find that. But to understand could we see just one more example ##a^{4}=b^{4}=e##, ##aba=b##? It should be noncommutative. But it is not easy to find order. Should it be at least 16?
 
Last edited:
LagrangeEuler said:
Great. Interesting. You easily find that. But to understand could we see just one more example ##a^{4}=b^{4}=e##, ##aba=b##?
Looks like ##Q_8=\langle x,y|x^4,x^2y^{-2},yxy^{-1}x\rangle##. Maybe I can figure it out - or you.
 
If you have a commutativity relation, you can turn any string of a's and b's into a string of the form a^kb^l, where 0 \leq k < n and 0 \leq l < m. There are exactly nm such strings, and each such string gives a distinct element of the group. Thus the order of the group is nm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler
fresh_42 said:
Looks like ##Q_8=\langle x,y|x^4,x^2y^{-2},yxy^{-1}x\rangle##. Maybe I can figure it out - or you.
This is a mistake than in the link?
https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...yejr_s-kcorwvMyFwZUeVMcxO_0OMKGMFqBZBzW5c_t-w

"The smallest example occurs in order 16. There are 3 nonisomorphic groups of order 16, each having 3 elements of order 2 and 12 elements of order 4. One of them is the abelian group, direct sum of two cyclic groups of order 4. Another is the direct product of the quaternion group of order 8 with a cyclic group of order 2. The third one is generated by two elements ##a## and ##b## of order 4 with the relation ##aba=b##.

In the book by Thomas and Wood, Group Tables, these are called 16/3, 16/7, and 16/10, respectively. I don't know whether other sources use this numbering."
 
  • #10
Yes, you are right, there are ##16## elements, listed by @pasmith in post #8. Hence the task is to calculate the group table or list all subgroups to identify which of the nine non Abelian groups it is.
 
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
Yes, you are right, there are ##16## elements, listed by @pasmith in post #8. Hence the task is to calculate the group table or list all subgroups to identify which of the nine non Abelian groups it is.
It is somehow too hard to see it sometimes from the relation between generators. From ##a^4=e##,##b^4=e## it should be at least group of order ##8## from Lagrange theorem. Right? However it could be ##12##,##16##... It is very hard to see. :(
 
  • #12
All elements ##a^nb^m## with ##0\leq n,m <4## are different, which are sixteen. If it was Abelian then we would get ##a^2=1## from ##aba=b##, which we excluded. So we have nine non Abelian groups of order ##16##. Next I would exclude elements of order eight, which reduces the possibilities to five groups.
 
  • #13
To construct the Cayley table, observe that if aba = b then ba = a^3 b, from which it follows that b^k a^l = a^{3^kl}b^k since moving an a to the left of a b gives you three times as many a's. Hence <br /> (a^k b^l)(a^p b^q) = a^{k+3^l p}b^{l+q}.
 
  • #14
You might have fun playing around with pairs of signed permutation matrices with only 1,-1,and zero as entries. Start with arbitrary a and b with finite powers and see what groups they generate.

For instance ##a= \begin{pmatrix}0&0&0&^{-}1\\1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&1&0\end{pmatrix}## and ##b=\begin{pmatrix}0&0&1&0\\0&0&0&1\\1&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\end{pmatrix}##

Here ##a^8=1## and ##b^2=1##

Notice that the subgroup generated by ##a^2## and ##b## is the dihedral group of order 8
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
991
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
993
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K