Parallel-ish Theories Terminology

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the appropriate terminology for describing the relationship between overlapping theories in scientific explanations. It highlights examples such as Newtonian physics and relativity, as well as pre- and post-Darwinian classifications, where two theories may explain similar phenomena but are based on different underlying principles. The focus is on finding a term that captures the area of overlap in observations between a newer, broader theory (A) and an older, narrower theory (B). Various suggestions are proposed, including "incorporates," "subsumes," "encompasses," and "includes," with a preference for "subsumes" as it effectively conveys that A covers the observations of B while extending beyond them. The discussion also touches on the idea of converging theories, emphasizing the need for precise language to describe these relationships in scientific discourse.
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,670
Reaction score
11,540
What is it called went to different theories (or kinds of theories, apparently) overlap in their explanations over major parts of their explanatory field and you want to talk about the area of overlap in the phenomena they explain?

Classic examples:
  • Newtonian physics vs. relativity, similar explanatory power until special circumstances are examined, like observing behaviors adjacent to big masses.
  • Pre-Darwinan classification, vs. Post-Darwinian classification (almost identical classification of know species, based on entirely different underlying concepts), both predicted more similar things should be grouped together.
These kinds of transitions are important in the history of science.
I am interested in what would be the best term for the overlapping groups of observation, rather then the part of their explanatory field where things diverge.

My question is kind of thesaurus-istic:

if A and B are two different theoretical explanations and
A is newer and
it also covers a larger field of observations (or a large explanatory range)
if A explains the observations of B plus some other stuff, which word would be best name that relationship or or the area of explanatory overlap?
What if the relationship was among many different theoretical approaches?

Does A incorporates B?
Does A subsumes B?
Does A explains B?
Does A encompass B?
Does A absorb B?
Does A assimilate B?
Does A include B?
Does A embraces B?
Does A consolidates B?
Does A covers B?
Does A deals with B?

Some of these come from my computer thesaurus.
There may not be a perfect word, but several choices, preferred for different reasons, thus no obvious answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BillTre said:
I am interested in what would be the best term for the overlapping groups of observation, rather then the part of their explanatory field where things diverge.
I have indeed heard of converging theories, points of view, or explanations. But converging was the verb.
 
BillTre said:
if A and B are two different theoretical explanations and
A is newer and
it also covers a larger field of observations (or a large explanatory range)
if A explains the observations of B plus some other stuff, which word would be best name that relationship or or the area of explanatory overlap?
What if the relationship was among many different theoretical approaches?
In physics, if you consider, e.g., relativity and Newton's laws, you may say that Newton's laws are a special case of SR, or you may say SR covers a broader range of velocities, and it reduces to Newton's laws when ##v \ll c##. I don't know if this terminology will be appropriate for the example you gave in biology.
 
Wrichik Basu said:
In physics, if you consider, e.g., relativity and Newton's laws, you may say that Newton's laws are a special case of SR, or you may say SR covers a broader range of velocities, and it reduces to Newton's laws when ##v \ll c##. I don't know if this terminology will be appropriate for the example you gave in biology.
You might also say that Newton's laws approximate special relativity (under the appropriate conditions).
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
I'd go with subsumes.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top