Parametric representation of a line

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a new parametric representation of the line segment defined by the curve r(t) = (t+1, 0.5(1-t), 0) using arc length as the parameter. The arc length s(t) was calculated as s(t) = (1/2)√5(t+1), with the total length of the segment being √5. The next step involves finding the inverse function t(s) of the arc length and substituting it back into the original parametric equation to obtain the new representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Knowledge of arc length calculation in calculus
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Ability to find inverse functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive inverse functions in calculus
  • Study the properties of parametric curves
  • Explore arc length parametrization techniques
  • Practice integration of vector functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and vector analysis, as well as anyone interested in parametric representations of curves.

brunette15
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I am give the following curve r(t) = (t+1,0.5(1-t),0) where t ranges from -1 to 1. I am now trying to derive a new parametric representation of this line segment using the arc length as the parametric variable.

I have integrated r'(t) from -1 to 1 and found that the length of the segment ranges from 0 to 5^0.5 however am unsure where to go from here.

Can anyone please help me finish off this problem? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brunette15 said:
I am give the following curve r(t) = (t+1,0.5(1-t),0) where t ranges from -1 to 1. I am now trying to derive a new parametric representation of this line segment using the arc length as the parametric variable.

I have integrated r'(t) from -1 to 1 and found that the length of the segment ranges from 0 to 5^0.5 however am unsure where to go from here.

Can anyone please help me finish off this problem? :)

Hey brunette15! ;)

You have correctly calculated the full arc length, but let's get the arc length up to some arbitrary $t$.
That arc length is given by:
$$s(t) = \int_{-1}^t \|\mathbf r'(t)\| \,dt = \int_{-1}^t \|(1,-0.5,0)\| \,dt
= \int_{-1}^t \frac 12 \sqrt 5 \,dt =\frac 12 \sqrt 5(t+1)$$Now let $\mathbf{\tilde r}(s)$ be the new parametric representation of this line segment using the arc length as the parametric variable.
Then:
$$\mathbf{\tilde r}(s) = \mathbf{r}(t(s))$$
where $t(s)$ is the inverse function of the arc length $s(t)$.How about finding the inverse of $s(t)$ and substituting it in $\mathbf r(t)$? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey brunette15! ;)

You have correctly calculated the full arc length, but let's get the arc length up to some arbitrary $t$.
That arc length is given by:
$$s(t) = \int_{-1}^t \|\mathbf r'(t)\| \,dt = \int_{-1}^t \|(1,-0.5,0)\| \,dt
= \int_{-1}^t \frac 12 \sqrt 5 \,dt =\frac 12 \sqrt 5(t+1)$$Now let $\mathbf{\tilde r}(s)$ be the new parametric representation of this line segment using the arc length as the parametric variable.
Then:
$$\mathbf{\tilde r}(s) = \mathbf{r}(t(s))$$
where $t(s)$ is the inverse function of the arc length $s(t)$.How about finding the inverse of $s(t)$ and substituting it in $\mathbf r(t)$? (Wondering)

Thankyou so much! I know how to figure it out from here :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K