Pauli matrices forming a basis for 2x2 operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Pauli matrices and their role as a basis for 2x2 matrices, specifically highlighting their linear independence and orthogonality. The first proof demonstrates linear independence through simultaneous equations derived from a linear combination of the matrices, while the second proof employs a matrix inner product defined by \(\sigma_{i}.\sigma_{j} = \frac{1}{2}Tr(\sigma_i \sigma_{j}^{\bot})\) to establish orthogonality. The orthogonality of the Pauli matrices implies linear independence, confirming that they indeed form a basis for 2x2 matrices. The connection between the two proofs lies in the properties of inner products and their implications for linear independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly linear independence and basis.
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices and their mathematical properties.
  • Knowledge of matrix inner products and their definitions.
  • Experience with trace operations in matrix algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of inner products in finite-dimensional vector spaces.
  • Study the implications of orthogonality in linear algebra.
  • Investigate the role of trace in matrix operations and its applications.
  • Learn about the significance of the Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of quantum mechanics seeking to deepen their understanding of linear algebra and the mathematical foundations of quantum operators.

McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

We know that the Pauli matrices along with the identity form a basis of 2x2 matrices. Any 2x2 matrix can be expressed as a linear combination of these four matrices. I know of one proof where I take

a_{0}\sigma_{0}+a_{1}\sigma_{1}+a_{2}\sigma_{2}+a_{3}\sigma_{3}=0

Here, \sigma_{0} is the identity. We get four simultaneous equations in a_{i} and it is fairly trivial to show that each a_{i} must be zero. This implies that the four matrices are linearly independent and therefore form a basis for 2x2 matrices.

But I recently discovered a different way to show this. This utilizes a matrix inner product defined by \sigma_{i}.\sigma_{j} = \frac{1}{2}Tr(\sigma_i \sigma_{j}^{\bot}). Here A^{\bot} is the transpose conjugate and the 1/2 is just to remove the factor of 2 that arises from the matrices being 2x2. The argument goes that this definition gives the inner product equal to 1 if i=j and 0 otherwise meaning that the four matrices we have are orthogonal. Since there are four of them, and the orthogonality is interpreted as linear independence, they form a basis.

My question is, how can I connect these two proofs? The second one seems nice but I cannot see how it is the same, in general, as the first proof. The definition of orthogonality seems arbitrary (it obeys the axioms for inner product, yes, but surely there is more than that) and I cannot really see how showing that matrices that are orthogonal by this definition makes them linearly independent in the way the first proof shows. Thank you very much for your help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M Saad
Physics news on Phys.org
Let \{x_k\} be an orthonormal set in a finite-dimensional vector space V. Suppose that \sum_k a_k x_k=0. Then for all i, 0=\langle x_i,0\rangle=\langle x_i,\sum_k a_k x_k\rangle=\sum_k a_k\langle x_i,x_k\rangle=\sum_k\delta_{ik}=a_i. This means that the set is linearly independent.

It's always easier to use the fact that we're working with an inner product than to use the definition of the specific inner product you've been given.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M Saad
That's a very nice proof. Thank you Fredrik!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K