Photon bunching in quantum optics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hanbury Brown Twiss (HBT) effect, which demonstrates that photons from thermal or coherent sources arrive in pairs, leading to photon bunching. The experimental setup involves a 50-50 beam splitter with a variable time delay, revealing that intensity doubles when no delay is present compared to significant delays. Photon bunching is confirmed for chaotic light sources exhibiting super-Poissonian statistics, while coherent light sources, despite having a coherence function of 1, can also produce bunched pairs due to random arrivals. The conversation also touches on the implications of using multiple beam splitters and the distinction between classical and quantum interpretations of photon statistics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hanbury Brown Twiss effect
  • Familiarity with photon statistics, specifically super-Poissonian and Poissonian distributions
  • Knowledge of second-order coherence functions, g^{(2)}(τ) and g^{(2)}(0)
  • Basic principles of quantum optics and experimental setups involving beam splitters
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of the Hanbury Brown Twiss effect
  • Investigate the differences between super-Poissonian and Poissonian statistics in photon sources
  • Learn about the implications of photon anti-bunching and photon number squeezing in quantum optics
  • Examine experimental designs involving multiple beam splitters and their effects on photon intensity
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum optics who are interested in photon statistics and experimental setups for studying light behavior.

yosofun
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The Hanbury Brown Twiss effect, aka the photon bunching effect, states that photons (from a thermal or coherent source) arrive in pairs instead of individually.

The experimental setup consists of having a source go through a 50-50 beam splitter, where one path goes through a variable time delay.

It is found that for no time delay, the intensity is twice as that for significant time delay (i.e., greater than coherence time). This implies that photons arrive in pairs rather than individually.

Now, my question: what happens if the photons are split in more than 2 ways. Would the intensity be n times for n splits? Would this imply that photons (from thermal/coherent sources) are actually molecules?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There seems to be some confusion here. Photon bunching occurs for chaotic light but not for coherent light. For example, consider chaotic light with a Lorentzian spectrum: classical and quantum theory predict the same degree of second order coherence. In particular, the classical inequality g^{(2)}(\tau) \leq g^{(2)}(0) is satsified. The interpretation is of course different, but photon bunching is equivalent to the intensity fluctuations of a classical field.

It is non-classical effects like photon anti-bunching g^{(2)}(\tau) > g^{(2)}(0) or photon number squeezing g^{(2)}(0) < 1, both of which violate classical inequalities, that truly distinguish the quantum from the classical.

Having said all that, I still haven't answered your question. Could you please describe your hypothetical experiment in a little more detail?

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wminus
Hi, I believe photon bunching also occurs for coherent light, since although the coherence function is 1 for coherent states, the coherent states are also prone to arrive randomly, as per the Poisson Distribution. Thus, even for low intensity, the coherent sources are likely to produce bunched pairs.

my experiment is basically a variation of the Hanbury Brown Twiss experiment, a.k.a, the famous photon bunching experiment. In the HBT experiment, a single beam-splitter is used to divide up the beam into two. One beam is subject to a variable time delay. The result was that when the variable time delay is 0, the intensity was 2 times as great (when compared to the case where one beam is time delayed). What happens if multiple splitters were used to divide the beam into n. Would the intensity be n times?

Physics Monkey said:
There seems to be some confusion here. Photon bunching occurs for chaotic light but not for coherent light. For example, consider chaotic light with a Lorentzian spectrum: classical and quantum theory predict the same degree of second order coherence. In particular, the classical inequality g^{(2)}(\tau) \leq g^{(2)}(0) is satsified. The interpretation is of course different, but photon bunching is equivalent to the intensity fluctuations of a classical field.
 
further comments?
 
Hi again yosofun, photon bunching is actually associated with super-Poissonian statistics, not Poissonian statistics. Lasers high above threshold tend to have Poissonian photon statistics while chaotic light sources are super-Poissonian i.e. they exhibit bunching. It is a hallmark of Poissonian processes that probabilities of events at different intervals are independent of each other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K