Play "The Wikipedia Game" - From Elvis to Queen Elizabeth II!

  • Thread starter Thread starter G01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Wikipedia
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a game played using Wikipedia articles, where participants attempt to connect two seemingly unrelated topics through internal links on Wikipedia. The game encourages creativity and exploration of connections between various subjects, with participants sharing their paths and challenges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share their experiences and strategies for connecting articles, such as starting from "Elvis Presley" to "Queen Elizabeth II" and discussing various paths taken.
  • Questions arise about the definition of internal Wikipedia links, specifically whether they include links in the body of the article or only those in the "See Also" section.
  • There is a suggestion that using lists might simplify the game, leading to a debate on whether they should be allowed.
  • Participants propose various starting and ending articles for new challenges, including "Britney Spears" to "E = mc^2" and "Global Warming" to "Ping Pong / Table Tennis."
  • Some participants express humor and frustration over the complexity of finding connections, noting the number of embedded links in articles.
  • Paths taken by participants vary widely, with some achieving connections in fewer steps than others, leading to discussions about efficiency and creativity in finding routes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the fun and challenge of the game, but there are multiple competing views regarding the rules, such as the use of lists and the definition of internal links. The discussion remains unresolved on these points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of what constitutes an internal link and the potential impact of using lists on the game's difficulty.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in creative problem-solving, trivia, or those looking for a humorous way to explore connections between diverse topics may find this discussion engaging.

G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Has anybody here ever played this game when you were bored? First you go on Wikipedia and select some random article. Then, you find a link on the page and go to the article it links to. Continue this process for long enough and you'll eventually end up at some article which you would never believe to have been connected to the original post!

Now try to have other people see if they can figure out how to get from one article to the other. First one to get from one to the other, using only internal Wikipedia links gets a point. Also, 2 bonus points are awarded for getting there using a quicker(less intermediate pages)route. This is assuming the author of the challenge is honest on how he got from one to the other. Honor system people! Most points wins! The game stops whenever you decide it does!

It's similar to that game where you pick a movie star and try to relate him to another celebrity via other people. It's a humorous way to pass free time.

Here's a funny chain I got. It's not too hard to get from one to the other, and it'll be a good starter question. The first person to get it gets the points. Once the current challenge is answered, anyone feel free to post another challenge.

Wikipedia Challenge #1:

(Name of Article)
Start: Elvis Presley
End: Queen Elizabeth II
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Once I got to the beetles it was over.
 
Sounds fun.

edit... Saturday night, playing the "wikipedia game" :cry:

edit2... Wait I have a question. Is an internal wikipedia link, a wikipedia link that is located in the "Body" of the Article. Or is an internal wikipedia link, a wikipedia link that is "See Also" section of the Article?

Also, we should probably post the actual sequence taken?
 
Last edited:
How about Queen Elizabeth II to dislocations (materials science)?
 
Are lists off limits? I would think yes, since a lot of these would probably become much easier.
 
OK, this is probably not the best route but here we go.

Queen Elizabeth II
St. James' Palace
Palace
The Crystal Palace
Glass
Crystal
Materials science
DislocationA better one.

Queen Elizabeth II
Italy
Rome
University of Rome La Sapienza (in the article the link is just displayed as "La Sapienza")
Vito_Volterra
Dislocation
 
Last edited:
Nice moose, that was the exact path I had in mind :smile:
 
  • #10
mattmns said:
edit2... Wait I have a question. Is an internal wikipedia link, a wikipedia link that is located in the "Body" of the Article. Or is an internal wikipedia link, a wikipedia link that is "See Also" section of the Article?

Also, we should probably post the actual sequence taken?

Yes to both.

EDIT:

My path for the first one was: Elvis-Scottish-Scotland-Queen Elizabeth II
 
Last edited:
  • #11
mattmns said:
Are lists off limits? I would think yes, since a lot of these would probably become much easier.

Yeah, I agree. Good idea!
 
  • #12
how many points if i can guess the correct way without using wiki?
 
  • #13
ice109 said:
how many points if i can guess the correct way without using wiki?

\infty points :wink:
 
  • #14
Start: Chess
End: Sex
 
  • #15
Got it!

Chess--->India--->Gender Ratio---->Female---> Sex


How about this one:

Start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex"
End: Global Warming
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
G01 said:
Start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex"
End: Global Warming
Sex -> Sexism -> United States -> Global Warming.

How about:

Start: Global Warming
End: Ping Pong / Table Tennis.

(Actually, this one isn't too hard apparently!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
Nice solution, I hadn't thought about that one.

Sex -> Biology -> Natural Environment -> Global Warming

Start: Global Warming
End: Wooden iron

edit... Looks like I was beat!

Note to self: ExxonMobil, Shareholder, Volunteer, Oxymoron, Wooden iron[/color]
 
Last edited:
  • #18
its a silly game, every single article has so many embedded links
 
  • #19
It would be better to try to find two articles that were as far apart as possible.
 
  • #21
Table tennis => sport => Hewie Louis and the News => Elvis Costello => Shakespeare => Stratford-upon-Avon => Arthur C. Clark => British Interplanetary Society => Barnard's Star => Red Dwarf => metals => carbon => London => Royal Albert Hall => Led Zepplin => Dave Edmonds => Elvis Costello (again!) => Rock n Roll Hall of Fame => Little Richard => Elton John!

Hah! 19 steps!
Shoe shop ==>Table tennis (4 steps)
 
Last edited:
  • #22
morphism said:
Sex -> Sexism -> United States -> Global Warming.

How about:

Start: Global Warming
End: Ping Pong / Table Tennis.

(Actually, this one isn't too hard apparently!)

Nice, more efficient than my route if I remember.

mattmns said:
Nice solution, I hadn't thought about that one.

Sex -> Biology -> Natural Environment -> Global Warming

Start: Global Warming
End: Wooden iron

edit... Looks like I was beat!

Note to self: ExxonMobil, Shareholder, Volunteer, Oxymoron, Wooden iron[/color]

This was more along the lines of my path to global warming.

Chi Meson said:
Table tennis => sport => Hewie Louis and the News => Elvis Costello => Shakespeare => Stratford-upon-Avon => Arthur C. Clark => British Interplanetary Society => Barnard's Star => Red Dwarf => metals => carbon => London => Royal Albert Hall => Led Zepplin => Dave Edmonds => Elvis Costello (again!) => Rock n Roll Hall of Fame => Little Richard => Elton John!

Hah! 19 steps!
Shoe shop ==>Table tennis (4 steps)

You seemed to have looped around a little there!

Shoe(redirected from Shoe shop)-->Athletic Shoe--->Tennis--->Tennis(disambiguation)--->Table Tennis

Would this be 4 or 5 steps?
 
Last edited:
  • #23
what about this one:

start: spookie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spooky
end: Permafrost http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permafrost

Edit: finally I found it
Start: Global Warming
End: Wooden iron

Wooden Iron <= Arthur Schopenhauer <= The World as Will and Representation <= Category:1819 books <= Category:1819 works <= Category:1819 <= Category:1810s <= Category:1815 <= 1815 <= 1812 <= War of 1812 <= United States Navy <= Iron Curtain [use U.S. Naval] <= Europe <= Hardwood <= Wood <= Fossil fuel <= Global warming

Haha. Just follow the arrows. Going backwards as I wrote it I was clicking back on the browser. I would reverse this list but I'm tired and sleepy.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
you did it; faster than me. I had to go through toilets before I got to permafrost :smile:
 
  • #26
Start: D'oh!
End: Differentiable Manifold (corrected)
 
Last edited:
  • #27
D'oh > Gerald Ford > University of Michigan Law School > University of Michigan > Information theory > Applied mathematics > Topology > Manifold > Differentiable manifold (you did mean Differentiable right, not Differential?)

Start: Differentiable manifold
End: Neuron
(5 Steps)
 
  • #28
mattmns said:
Start: D'oh!
End: Differential Manifold

I took f***ing forever, and gave up trying to find a quick route.

D'oh! -> Minced Oath -> United States -> Educational attainment in the United States -> Bachelor's degree -> Bachelor of Mathematics -> Mathematics -> Manifold -> Differentiable manifold

8 steps... grr
edit: HAHA, same amount of steps as AKG
 
  • #29
Differentiable Manifold -> General relativity -> Albert Einstein -> Albert Einstein's Brain -> Neuron. Probably not what was expected, but it works :smile:
 
  • #30
I should perhaps admit that I don't know if there was a quick route on that one at all. I was first looking for using Al Jean and his degree in Math to get to math, but that fell through. Then I started working through Harvard, which I think was not that easy. Then I went with the US route which worked after a while.

Also you would think there would be a link, or at least mention, of Homer's obsession with doughnuts, which gives a quick connection, but there isn't one that I could find.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K