Priceless: Pat Buchanan owns himself at English Only 'Conferenece'

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    English
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a panel at an English Only conference where Pat Buchanan made comments regarding Judge Sotomayor's educational background and struggles with English. Participants explore the implications of Buchanan's remarks, the irony of a misspelled banner, and broader themes of racism and nationalism in political discourse.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight Buchanan's mocking of Sotomayor's efforts to learn English, questioning the validity of his claims about her reading materials.
  • Others note the irony of a misspelled banner at the conference, with some joking about the spelling error.
  • A participant points out that the banner's size and spacing could accommodate the extra letter, suggesting a possible oversight in design.
  • Concerns are raised about Buchanan's association with a white nationalist figure, with some arguing that this could alienate parts of his political base.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of labeling individuals as white supremacists versus white nationalists, with references to historical and contemporary racial politics.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the significance of the banner incident in light of Buchanan's controversial political views and historical positions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of humor and criticism regarding the banner and Buchanan's comments, but there is no clear consensus on the implications of his remarks or the broader themes of racism and nationalism discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal interpretations of political labels and historical events, which may depend on individual perspectives and definitions.

gravenewworld
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
27
The panelists pressed on with their anti-bilingualism diatribe without noting the irony of the obvious misspelling on the banner:

PAT BUCHANAN: Judge Sotomayor is up there at school in New York, she gets a scholarship to Princeton, she’s graduated with all these big honors and awards they said she never won. What’s she doing there in the summer? They said her adviser told her to read children’s classics so she can learn English better. How do you graduate number one in Princeton if you’re in the summer and you’re reading Rumpelstiltskin and Snow White? [laughter] [...]

Mocking Sotomayor’s struggle to learn English has become a habit for Buchanan. On CSPAN a few weeks ago, Buchanan tried to undermine Sotomayor’s qualifications by saying she had read Pinocchio as a part of her “college work.” Buchanan was referencing a New York Times article, which talked about how hard Sotomayor had to work to graduate at the top of her class from Princeton. The article stated that she “spent summers reading children’s classics she had missed in a Spanish-speaking home and ‘re-teaching’ herself to write ‘proper English’ by reading elementary grammar books.” Sotomayor never read children’s books as part of her “college work” and the books consisted of classics such as “Huckleberry Finn” and “Pride and Prejudice” — not Snow White, as Buchanan contends.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/buchanan.jpg

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/22/misspelled-english-buchanan/Hilarious self-ownage
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Too funny.

Thanks.
 
i dont' see anthyningn wrogn
 
There is an extra e towards the end in conference.
 
fleem said:
i dont' see anthyningn wrogn

Conference is spelled "conference", not "conferenece".

EDIT: I just realized you were making a joke. :biggrin:
 
What a D-bag. That's great.
 
Yo dudes I was kidding with the typos. Thanks for not laughing though :)
 
Hmm, the even worse ownage seems to be the picture of him with the white nationalist guy. Much of his base, while into political conservativism and other nutty stuff, doesn't support white supremacy. This could cost him.
 
Look at the banner. It is the correct size and has the spacing to include the extra letter.:smile:
 
  • #10
edward said:
Look at the banner. It is the correct size and has the spacing to include the extra letter.:smile:


By the 21st century, most cloth banners and T-shirts were designed using one of several available software programs. Almost all of these automatically center your text (if desired) or, alternatively, left justify, tab, etc - generally, all of the functions normally available in power point.

Some of these programs also come complete with spellcheck software, but using it can be quite difficult - requiring the user to click on an icon in order for the spelling to be checked, for example.
 
  • #11
arunma said:
Hmm, the even worse ownage seems to be the picture of him with the white nationalist guy. Much of his base, while into political conservativism and other nutty stuff, doesn't support white supremacy. This could cost him.

I think Peter Brimelow would call you a racist for calling him a white supremacist. He would probably try to argue white nationalist=something like a Black Panther.
 
  • #12
edward said:
Look at the banner. It is the correct size and has the spacing to include the extra letter.:smile:

Probably manufactured by non-English speaking workers in an offshore sweat shop.

These are the same people that hate NAFTA no doubt.
 
  • #13
This is small potatos (potatoes?) Buchanan wrote a book in which he argued that the US should not have declared war on Germany. He apparently was unaware that it was Germany that declared war on the US.
 
  • #14
gravenewworld said:
I think Peter Brimelow would call you a racist for calling him a white supremacist. He would probably try to argue white nationalist=something like a Black Panther.

And who said that black panthers aren't racists?

I think I see what you're saying. In the twenty-first century, even racism has been sexed up and politically corrected. As David Duke says, "we're not so much anti-black as we are pro-white." As bad as these guys are, they do (if inadvertently) correctly point out that all forms of excessive racial pride can turn into racism. A black nationalist isn't any better than the white supremacist.