Problem involving mathematical induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving mathematical induction to prove a combinatorial identity related to binomial coefficients. The statement to be proven is that the sum of binomial coefficients from 0 to n equals another binomial coefficient, specifically $$ \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1} $$ for integers r and n within specified bounds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the base case and induction step, questioning the form of the statement for P(m+1) and the implications of the bounds on r. There is discussion about the interpretation of binomial coefficients when k is less than r and the validity of the induction assumption.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the formulation of the induction hypothesis. Some participants express confusion over the bounds of r and the implications of the induction step, while others clarify the necessary conditions for the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is sourced from a textbook that specifically requires the use of mathematical induction, despite the existence of combinatorial proofs for the identity in question.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Prove that ## \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1} ## where ##1 \leq r \leq n##
Relevant Equations
Mathematical Induction
Here is my attempt. Let ##P(n)## be the statement

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1} $$

where ##1 \leq r \leq n##. Now base case is ##n = 1##. For this, we have

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{0}{r} + \binom{1}{r} $$

Since ##1 \leq r \leq 1##. It means that ##r = 1##. With this, above expression evaluates to

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{0}{r} + \binom{1}{r} = \binom{0}{1} + \binom{1}{1} $$

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{0}{1} + \binom{1}{1} = 0 + 1 = 1 $$

And, we have on right hand side,

$$ \binom{1+1}{1+1} = 1 $$

Since both sides match, ##P(1)## is true. Now, let ##m \geq 1 ## be an arbitrary in ##\mathbb{N}##. Suppose that ##P(m)## is true. i.e.

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{m+1}{r+1} $$

where ##1 \leq r \leq m##. We are supposed to prove ##P(m+1)##. But, I don't know what will be the form of ##P(m+1)##. My guess is

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m+1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{m+2}{r+1} $$

But, this doesn't look quite right. On right hand side, we have ##m+2## in the top and ##r+1## at the bottom. And, does ## 1 \leq r \leq m+1 ## here ? I am little confused.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
issacnewton said:
We are supposed to prove ##P(m+1)##. But, I don't know what will be the form of ##P(m+1)##. My guess is

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m+1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{m+2}{r+1} $$

But, this doesn't look quite right. On right hand side, we have ##m+2## in the top and ##r+1## at the bottom. And, does ## 1 \leq r \leq m+1 ## here ?
Don't change r in the equation. Only add one to m in the equation and the range of r to get P(m). That will automatically give r an increase in its range to ##1 \le r \le m+1##.
CORRECTION: The original P(n) already had r+1 on the right hand side, so that is ok for P(n+1).
 
Last edited:
So, what I have written for ##P(m+1)## is right ?. I don't understand your last sentence.
 
##r## is fixed between ##1## and ##n##. When you do the induction step, ##r## is fixed between ##1## and ##n+1##. The induction assumption is that said equality holds for ##n## and for every ##1\leqslant r\leqslant n##.

Regardless, you need to work out what ##\binom{k}{r}## means for ##k<r##. Naturally one would think there are zero choices of ##r> k## out of ##k##, so by induction assumption it follows that for any ##1\leqslant r\leqslant n##

<br /> \sum _{k=0}^{n+1} \binom{k}{r} = \sum _{k=0}^{n}\binom{k}{r} + \binom{n+1}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1} + \binom{n+1}{r}.<br />
Now figure out if and why this is equal to the required quantity. Additionally, what happens when ##r=n+1##?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
issacnewton said:
So, what I have written for ##P(m+1)## is right ?.
I disagree with the "r+1" on the right side of your equation. I think it should remain just "r".
issacnewton said:
I don't understand your last sentence.
The lower line on the right side of your equation should range from 1 to m+1. It should just be r (not r+1) from 1 to m+1. So your ##1 \le r \le m+1## is correct.
CORRECTION: The original P(n) already had r+1 on the right hand side, so that is ok for P(n+1).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
Ok, so , I have to prove ##P(m+1)##, i.e.

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m+1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{m+2}{r+1} $$

where ##1 \leq r \leq m+1##. We have

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m+1} \binom{k}{r} = \sum_{k=0}^{m} \binom{k}{r} + \binom{m+1}{r} $$

Using ##P(m)## here

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m} \binom{k}{r} + \binom{m+1}{r} = \binom{m+1}{r + 1} + \binom{m+1}{r}$$

Now, we use a recurrence relation for the binomial coefficient.

$$ \binom{m+1}{r + 1} + \binom{m+1}{r} = \binom{m+2}{r + 1} $$

This proves that

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{m+1} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{m+2}{r + 1} $$

where ##1 \leq r \leq m+1##. This means that ##P(m+1)## is true. Since ##m \geq 1## is arbitrary, we have

$$ \forall \; m \geq 1 \bigl[ P(m) \rightarrow P(m+1) \bigr] $$

Hence, using, mathematical induction, we have, for all ##n \in \mathbb{N}##

$$ \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1} $$

where ##1 \leq r \leq n##. I hope this is valid proof.

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
The induction assumption applies for ##1\leqslant r\leqslant m##. In the event ##r=m+1##, we have the identity ##1=1##.
 
It's called (Isaac)Newton's Binomial for a reason! ;).
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
Were you required to use induction to prove this? Many identities like this have natural combinatorial interpretations (and the combinatorics is often how they were first discovered), and this one has a good combinatorial two line proof
 
  • #10
I'm confused on whether we're supposed to iterate over ##r## or show that the result holds for all ##r## integers ##1,2,..,n##.
 
  • #11
The problem is given in the book called Book of Proof which is available online as PDF. I am aware that this can be proven using combinatorics. But there, author wants us to use mathematical induction.
 
  • #12
WWGD said:
I'm confused on whether we're supposed to iterate over ##r## or show that the result holds for all ##r## integers ##1,2,..,n##.
The latter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K