MHB Problem of the Week # 154 - March 9, 2015

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on Problem of the Week #154, which challenges participants to analyze free-fall motion using Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation instead of the constant gravitational force approximation. Participants are tasked with deriving the position of an object in free fall as a function of time, starting from rest at a distance from the Earth's center. The problem allows for an implicit solution and simplifies the scenario by neglecting factors like air resistance and the Coriolis effect. Despite the complexity, no participants provided answers, prompting the original poster to share their solution. The thread emphasizes the importance of engaging with the problem for deeper understanding in physics.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

In freshman physics, or high school physics, you analyzed free-fall motion by assuming that the gravitational force was a constant, $mg$, from which you can use the constant-acceleration kinematic equations. Let's improve on this approximation one notch by introducing a more accurate gravitational force:
$$F=\frac{GM_{e}m}{r^2},$$
Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. Here $G$ is the gravitational constant, $M_e$ is the mass of the earth, $m$ is the mass of the object in the next sentence, and $r$ is the distance from the center-of-mass of the Earth to the center-of-mass of the object. Assuming that the object starts from rest at some initial distance $r_0$ from the center of the earth, find its position as a function of time. You may neglect air resistance, the dependence of pressure on height, the Coriolis effect, etc. That is, for this model, the only force present is gravity.

[EDIT] You may obtain an implicit result.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's POTW. You can view my solution below:

We have that
$$F=-\frac{G M_e m}{r^2}=m \ddot{r}.$$
Multiplying both sides by $\dot{r}$ and canceling the $m$'s yields
$$-G M_e r^{-2} \dot{r}=\ddot{r} \, \dot{r}.$$
Integrating once yields
\begin{align*}
-GM_e \int r^{-2} \dot{r} \, dt &=\int \dot{r} \ddot{r} \, dt \\
\frac{GM_e}{r}+C&=\frac{\dot{r}^2}{2}.
\end{align*}
Plugging in the initial conditions yields
$$\frac{GM_e}{r_0}+C=0 \quad \implies \quad
C=-\frac{GM_e}{r_0}.$$
Hence, our DE is now
$$\frac{GM_e}{r}-\frac{GM_e}{r_0}=\frac{\dot{r}^2}{2},$$
or
$$\dot{r}=\sqrt{2GM_e\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{r_0}\right)}.$$
We can separate variables as follows:
$$\frac{dr}{\sqrt{2GM_e\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{r_0}\right)}}=dt.$$
When we perform these integrals, we obtain
$$\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{2 G M_e}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{r_0-r}}\left[\sqrt{r}(r-r_0)
+r_0\sqrt{r_0-r}\arctan\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_0-r}}\,\right)\right]=t+C.$$
The LHS is not one in which we can simply plug in $r_0$ for $r$, but we can
do the limit as $r\to r_0$. This yields
$$\frac{\pi r_0^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{2 G M_e}}=C,$$
and thus our implicit expression for $r$ as a function of $t$ is given by
$$\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{2 G M_e}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{r_0-r}}\left[\sqrt{r}(r-r_0)
+r_0\sqrt{r_0-r}\arctan\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_0-r}}\,\right)\right]=
t+\frac{\pi r_0^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{2 G M_e}}.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K