Problem Of The Week # 323 - Sep 14, 2018

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Problem of the Week #323 discusses the tensor sum of two vectors in the context of tensor products in linear algebra. Specifically, it establishes that for any basis vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ in $\Bbb R^2$, the expression $v_1 \otimes v_2 + v_2 \otimes v_1$ in $\Bbb R^2 \otimes_{\Bbb R} \Bbb R^2$ cannot be simplified to a simple tensor. This conclusion is supported by the solution provided by the user castor28, which demonstrates the properties of tensor products and their implications in vector spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor products, specifically in the context of linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with vector spaces, particularly $\Bbb R^2$.
  • Knowledge of basis vectors and their properties in linear transformations.
  • Basic mathematical notation and operations involving tensors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of tensor products in linear algebra.
  • Study the implications of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors.
  • Learn about the Kronecker product and its applications in vector spaces.
  • Investigate advanced topics in multilinear algebra and their relevance to tensor calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of tensor products and their applications in vector spaces.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Show that, for any basis $v_1, v_2 \in \Bbb R^2$, the sum $v_1 \otimes v_2 + v_2 \otimes v_1$ in $\Bbb R^2 \otimes_{\Bbb R} \Bbb R^2$ cannot be reduced to a simple tensor.
-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was solved correctly by castor28. You can read his solution below.
Assume by contradiction that $v_1\otimes v_2 + v_2\otimes v_1=(\alpha v_1+\beta v_2)\otimes(\gamma v_1+\delta v_2)$.
We have:
$$
(\alpha v_1+\beta v_2)\otimes(\gamma v_1+\delta v_2)=\alpha\gamma (v_1\otimes v_1)+\alpha\delta (v_1\otimes v_2) + \beta\gamma (v_2\otimes v_1) + \beta\delta (v_2\otimes v_2)
$$
As the $(v_i\otimes v_j)$ constitute a basis for $\mathbb{R}\otimes\mathbb{R}$, we must have:
\begin{align*}
\alpha\gamma &= 0\\
\alpha\delta &= 1\\
\beta\gamma &= 1 \\
\beta\delta &= 0
\end{align*}
As $\alpha\delta=1$, we have $\alpha\ne0$. As $\alpha\gamma = 0$, we have $\gamma=0$, and this contradicts the fact that $\beta\gamma=1$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K