Proof by Contradiction: Converse of A(n) Holds for All n ∈ Z

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof by contradiction regarding the statement: "If n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2 for some q ∈ Z, then n^2 = 3t + 1 for some t ∈ Z." Participants clarify that assuming n^2 ≠ 3t + 1 while trying to prove the converse is unnecessary and does not constitute a valid proof by contradiction. The correct approach is to demonstrate that for all integers n satisfying n^2 = 3t + 1, there exists an integer q such that n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2. This distinction is crucial for understanding the logical structure of the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of proof by contradiction
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic
  • Basic knowledge of integer properties
  • Experience with mathematical notation, particularly with integers (Z) and quadratic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of proof by contradiction in mathematical logic
  • Explore modular arithmetic and its applications in number theory
  • Learn about the properties of quadratic residues in modular systems
  • Investigate the structure of mathematical proofs, focusing on direct versus indirect methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced proof techniques in number theory, particularly those studying properties of integers and quadratic equations.

UOAMCBURGER
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


“If n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2 for some q ∈ Z, then n 2 = 3t + 1 for some t ∈ Z.”
Use proof by contradiction to show that the converse of A(n) is true for all n ∈ Z.
For the proof by contradiction, on the answer sheet provided they have assumed n^2 = 3t+1 but n != 3q+1 and n != 3q+2.

Is it possible to have a valid proof by contradiction if you were to assume n = 3q+1 or n = 3q+2 is true for some n in Z, but n^2 != 3t+1 and then show that you can get n^2 into the form 3(.t..) + 1 ? where 3(.t..) is just obviously some multiple of 3... Hence a contradiction.?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
UOAMCBURGER said:
Is it possible to have a valid proof by contradiction if you were to assume n = 3q+1 or n = 3q+2 is true for some n in Z, but n^2 != 3t+1 and then show that you can get n^2 into the form 3(.t..) + 1 ? where 3(.t..) is just obviously some multiple of 3... Hence a contradiction.?
This would not be a proof by contradiction. It would just be proving the statement “If n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2 for some q ∈ Z, then n 2 = 3t + 1 for some t ∈ Z” directly. The assumption that n^2 ##\ne## 3t+1 would be superfluous.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tnich said:
This would not be a proof by contradiction. It would just be proving the statement “If n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2 for some q ∈ Z, then n 2 = 3t + 1 for some t ∈ Z” directly. The assumption that n^2 ##\ne## 3t+1 would be superfluous.
Also, the problem is to prove the converse, not the original statement. So what you need to prove is
##\forall t, n \in \mathbb Z ## such that ## n^2=3t+1, \exists q \in \mathbb Z ## such that ## n=3q+1## or ##n=3q+2##
 
tnich said:
Also, the problem is to prove the converse, not the original statement. So what you need to prove is
##\forall t, n \in \mathbb Z ## such that ## n^2=3t+1, \exists q \in \mathbb Z ## such that ## n=3q+1## or ##n=3q+2##
oh that is why i was getting confused, because given statement A>B for a proof by contradiction you get A>~B and show some contradiction, hence my question about the order of the proof. I see what I've done, thanks.
 
UOAMCBURGER said:

Homework Statement


“If n = 3q + 1 or n = 3q + 2 for some q ∈ Z, then n 2 = 3t + 1 for some t ∈ Z.”
Use proof by contradiction to show that the converse of A(n) is true for all n ∈ Z.
For the proof by contradiction, on the answer sheet provided they have assumed n^2 = 3t+1 but n != 3q+1 and n != 3q+2.

Is it possible to have a valid proof by contradiction if you were to assume n = 3q+1 or n = 3q+2 is true for some n in Z, but n^2 != 3t+1 and then show that you can get n^2 into the form 3(.t..) + 1 ? where 3(.t..) is just obviously some multiple of 3... Hence a contradiction.?

Is n 2 supposed to be ##n^2?## If so, write it properly, as n^2.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Is n 2 supposed to be ##n^2?## If so, write it properly, as n^2.
yes its meant to be n2, and obviously I did NOT intentionally write it as n 2 ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K