Propagation of uncertainty in the slope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the uncertainty in the parameters $$\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e'$$ and $$x_e'$$ derived from a Birge-Sponer plot of iodine's electronic spectrum. The slope is given as $$-2.069761731 \pm 0.075075941$$ and the intercept as $$133.3385857 \pm 2.396753622$$. The participants clarify the correct formulation for $$x_e'$$ and its uncertainty, ultimately deriving that $$\delta x_e' \approx 0.001$$. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of proper formatting for reporting measured parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Birge-Sponer plots in spectroscopy
  • Familiarity with regression analysis in Excel
  • Knowledge of uncertainty propagation in measurements
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study uncertainty propagation techniques in experimental physics
  • Learn about Birge-Sponer plots and their applications in spectroscopy
  • Explore advanced regression analysis methods in Excel
  • Investigate best practices for reporting scientific measurements
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students involved in spectroscopy and data analysis, particularly those working with uncertainty calculations in experimental results.

Jussi Lundahl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a lab report from electronic spectrum of iodine. I did Birge-Sponer plot from my data. Excel gave it to me a slope y = -2,0698x+133,34. From regression analysis I get uncertainties for slope and intercept.

Slope: ##-2,069761731 \pm 0,075075941##
Intercept: ##133,3385857 \pm 2,396753622##
But the real equation of the slope is $$\Delta E_{v'} = \tilde{\nu}_e'-2\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e'(v'+1)$$, where
$$\tilde{\nu}_e' = 133,3385857 \pm 2,396753622 $$
$$-2\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e' = -2,069761731 \pm 0,075075941 $$
$$(v'+1)=x $$.

Now the question: How I can calculate uncertainty of $$\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e'$$ and $$x_e'$$?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I cleaned up your equations a bit. To do what you want you have to write your desired parameters in terms of your measured parameters (the slope and the intercept).
 
Dale said:
I cleaned up your equations a bit. To do what you want you have to write your desired parameters in terms of your measured parameters (the slope and the intercept).

So, you mean like this:
$$\tilde{\nu}_e' - 2\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e' = 0$$
$$ x_e' = \frac{\tilde{\nu}_e'}{2\tilde{\nu}_e'}$$

and the uncertainty is
$$\delta x_e' = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\partial \frac{ \tilde{\nu}_e' }{2 \tilde{\nu}_e' }}{\partial \tilde{\nu}_e' } \times \delta \tilde{\nu}_e' \right)^2} $$
$$\delta x_e' = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{1/2}{\partial \tilde{\nu}_e'} \times 2,396753622 \right)^2}$$.

There for $$\delta x_e' =0.$$ Is this right?
 
Maybe. You haven't told us what your measured parameters are.

And by the way 133.3385857 +/- 2.396753622 should be 133.3 +/- 2.4. Do you understand why?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe. You haven't told us what your measured parameters are.

And by the way 133.3385857 +/- 2.396753622 should be 133.3 +/- 2.4. Do you understand why?

Yes, I understand. I just copy/paste the values from excel. :) What do you mean by measured parameters?

I think I figured out this problem...

$$Lets~calculate~x_e':$$
\begin{align*}
&& k= - 2\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e' &= -2,069761731\\ \\
\iff && x_e' &= -\frac{k}{2\tilde{\nu}_e'}\\ \\
\iff && x_e' &= \frac{2,069761731}{2\tilde{\nu}_e'} = 0,007761301
\end{align*}
and the uncertainty is:
\begin{align*}
&&\delta x_e' &= \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\partial x_e'}{\partial \tilde{\nu}_e' } \times \delta \tilde{\nu}_e' \right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial x_e'}{\partial k} \times \delta k\right)^2} \\ \\
\iff && \delta x_e' &= \sqrt{\left(\frac{k}{2\times (\tilde{\nu}_e')^2} \times \delta \tilde{\nu}_e'\right)^2 + \left(-\frac{1}{2 \times \tilde{\nu}_e'}\times \delta k \right)^2} \\ \\
\iff && \delta x_e' &= \sqrt{ \left( \frac{-2,069761731}{2\times (133,3385857)^2} \times 2,396753622 \right)^2 + \left(-\frac{1}{2\times133,3385857}\times 0,075075941\right)^2} \\ \\
&& &= 0,000314195 \approx 0,001
\end{align*}
 
Jussi Lundahl said:
So, you mean like this:
$$\tilde{\nu}_e' - 2\tilde{\nu}_e'x_e' = 0$$
$$ x_e' = \frac{\tilde{\nu}_e'}{2\tilde{\nu}_e'}$$

and the uncertainty is
$$\delta x_e' = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\partial \frac{ \tilde{\nu}_e' }{2 \tilde{\nu}_e' }}{\partial \tilde{\nu}_e' } \times \delta \tilde{\nu}_e' \right)^2} $$
$$\delta x_e' = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{1/2}{\partial \tilde{\nu}_e'} \times 2,396753622 \right)^2}$$.

There for $$\delta x_e' =0.$$ Is this right?
Sorry for necropost. There seems to be a mistake/typo here:

$$ x_e' = \frac{\tilde{\nu}_e'}{2\tilde{\nu}_e'}$$

Terms cancel out and we end up with 1/2.
 
Jussi Lundahl said:
Yes, I understand. I just copy/paste the values from excel. :
You can format numbers (and anything else) to show them in a variety of ways. Choose the decimal places and save yourself ink!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K