Prove Fibonacci identity using mathematical induction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Fibonacci identity using mathematical induction, specifically that the Fibonacci number \( F_n \) is even if and only if \( n \) is divisible by 3, denoted as \( P(n) \). The proof establishes base cases for \( n = 1, 2, 3 \) and uses strong induction to show that if \( P(m) \) holds for all \( m \) up to \( k \), then it also holds for \( k + 1 \). The key formula derived is \( F_{k+1} = 2F_{k-1} + F_{k-2} \), which is crucial for demonstrating the evenness of Fibonacci numbers based on the divisibility of \( n \) by 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fibonacci sequence properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic, particularly divisibility rules
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced mathematical induction methods
  • Explore properties of Fibonacci numbers in modular arithmetic
  • Learn about the applications of Fibonacci sequences in computer science
  • Investigate other identities related to Fibonacci numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in mathematical proofs involving sequences and induction.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Prove that ##n##th Fibanacci number ##F_n## is even if and only if ##3|n##
Relevant Equations
Mathematical Induction
Let ##P(n)## be the statement that

$$ F_n \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid n) $$

Now, my base cases are ##n=1,2,3##. For ##n=1##, statement I have to prove is

$$ F_1 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 1) $$

But since ##F_1 = 1## (Hence ##F_1## not even) and ##3 \nmid 1##, the above statement is vacuously true. Now, for ##n=2##, statement is

$$ F_2 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 2) $$

But, since ##F_2 = 1## (Hence ##F_2## not even) and ##3 \nmid 2##, the above statement is vacuously true. Lastly, for ##n=3##, statement is

$$ F_3 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 3) $$

Since ##F_3=2##, we have ##F_3## as even and ##3 \mid 3 ##. Since both antecedent and consequent are true, the biconditional is true. So, base cases are true. Now, let ## k \geqslant 3## be an arbitrary in ##\mathbb{N}##. And suppose that ##P(m)## is true for ##1 \leqslant m \leqslant k##. i.e.

$$ F_m \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid m) $$

for ##1 \leqslant m \leqslant k##. I have to prove that ##P(k+1)## is true. I have to prove that

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid k+1) $$

Since this is biconditional statement, I will first prove forward direction

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \to (3 \mid k+1) $$

Suppose that ##F_{k+1}## is even. Now, ##F_{k+1} = F_k + F_{k-1} = 2 F_{k-1} + F_{k-2}##. Using this, I must have ##F_{k-2}## as even. Since ##k \geqslant 3##, it implies ##1 \leqslant k-2 \leqslant k##. Now, I can use the inductive hypothesis and conclude that ##3 \mid (k-2)##. This means that ##k-2 = 3 \alpha## for some ##\alpha \in \mathbb{Z}##. It follows that ##k +1 = 3 (\alpha + 1)## and ##3 \mid (k+1)##.
This proves the forward direction. Now, I have to prove the reverse direction

$$ (3 \mid k+1) \to F_{k+1} \text{ is even} $$

Suppose ##3 \mid (k+1)##. I will try to prove this with contradiction, so assume the opposite of consequent. Hence suppose that ##F_{k+1}## is odd. Since ##F_{k+1} = 2 F_{k-1} + F_{k-2}##, it must be true that ##F_{k-2}## is odd. As before, since ##1 \leqslant k-2 \leqslant k##, using contrapositive of inductive hypothesis

$$ (F_{k-2} \text{ is odd}) \to (3 \nmid k-2)$$

Hence, it must be true that ##3 \nmid (k-2)##. But, as ##3 \mid (k+1)##, I have ## (k+1) = 3 \alpha## and ##(k-2) = 3(\alpha -1)##. This means that ##3 \mid (k-2)##. But this is a contradiction. So, initial assumption that ##F_{k+1}## is odd, is wrong. Hence ##F_{k+1}## is even. This proves the reverse direction. Hence

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid k+1) $$

So, ##P(k+1)## is true. Using strong induction, this means that ##P(n)## is true for all ##n \in \mathbb{N}##.

Is this a correct proof ?
Thanks ##\smile##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok but I got a bit lost in the many cases you considered. You derived the essential formula
$$
F_{k+1}=2F_{k-1}+F_{k-2}
$$
which means that ##F_{k+1}\equiv F_{k-2}\pmod{2}## and ##F_{k-2} \equiv 0 \pmod{2} \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k-2)## by induction hypothesis. Both statements together are
$$
F_{k+1}\equiv F_{k-2}\equiv 0 \pmod{2} \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k-2).
$$
Remains to show that ##3\,|\,(k-2) \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,((k-2)+3) \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k+1).##

You had all the ingredients. I just cleaned your room a little bit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
I should learn to be more succinct. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gavran
The proof can be get by using ## m = 3n ##, ## m = 3n+1 ## and ## m = 3n+2 ##, where ## n \in \mathbb {N_0} ##.

## m = 3n ##
The base case: ## n = 0 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_0 = 0 ##.
The induction step: Suppose that for ## n = k ##, where ## k \gt 0 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_{3k} ## is even. Now it must be proved that for ## n = k+1 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_{3(k+1)} ## is even too.

The same approach can be applied for ## m = 3n+1 ## and for ## m = 3n+2 ##, when ## F_m ## are odd numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
Alternatively, let ##P(n)## be that ##F_{3n}## is even, and ##F_{3n+1}## and ##F_{3n+2}## are odd. Starting with ##n =0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K