Prove Fibonacci identity using mathematical induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a Fibonacci identity using mathematical induction, specifically focusing on the evenness of Fibonacci numbers in relation to their indices modulo 3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the structure of the proof, including base cases and inductive steps. The original poster outlines a proof involving the relationship between Fibonacci numbers and divisibility by 3, while others suggest alternative approaches using different forms of induction.

Discussion Status

Some participants express understanding of the proof's structure, while others provide feedback on clarity and suggest refinements. Multiple approaches are being discussed, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering various cases based on the modulo 3 classification of indices, and there is an emphasis on ensuring the proof covers all necessary scenarios without contradictions.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Prove that ##n##th Fibanacci number ##F_n## is even if and only if ##3|n##
Relevant Equations
Mathematical Induction
Let ##P(n)## be the statement that

$$ F_n \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid n) $$

Now, my base cases are ##n=1,2,3##. For ##n=1##, statement I have to prove is

$$ F_1 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 1) $$

But since ##F_1 = 1## (Hence ##F_1## not even) and ##3 \nmid 1##, the above statement is vacuously true. Now, for ##n=2##, statement is

$$ F_2 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 2) $$

But, since ##F_2 = 1## (Hence ##F_2## not even) and ##3 \nmid 2##, the above statement is vacuously true. Lastly, for ##n=3##, statement is

$$ F_3 \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid 3) $$

Since ##F_3=2##, we have ##F_3## as even and ##3 \mid 3 ##. Since both antecedent and consequent are true, the biconditional is true. So, base cases are true. Now, let ## k \geqslant 3## be an arbitrary in ##\mathbb{N}##. And suppose that ##P(m)## is true for ##1 \leqslant m \leqslant k##. i.e.

$$ F_m \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid m) $$

for ##1 \leqslant m \leqslant k##. I have to prove that ##P(k+1)## is true. I have to prove that

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid k+1) $$

Since this is biconditional statement, I will first prove forward direction

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \to (3 \mid k+1) $$

Suppose that ##F_{k+1}## is even. Now, ##F_{k+1} = F_k + F_{k-1} = 2 F_{k-1} + F_{k-2}##. Using this, I must have ##F_{k-2}## as even. Since ##k \geqslant 3##, it implies ##1 \leqslant k-2 \leqslant k##. Now, I can use the inductive hypothesis and conclude that ##3 \mid (k-2)##. This means that ##k-2 = 3 \alpha## for some ##\alpha \in \mathbb{Z}##. It follows that ##k +1 = 3 (\alpha + 1)## and ##3 \mid (k+1)##.
This proves the forward direction. Now, I have to prove the reverse direction

$$ (3 \mid k+1) \to F_{k+1} \text{ is even} $$

Suppose ##3 \mid (k+1)##. I will try to prove this with contradiction, so assume the opposite of consequent. Hence suppose that ##F_{k+1}## is odd. Since ##F_{k+1} = 2 F_{k-1} + F_{k-2}##, it must be true that ##F_{k-2}## is odd. As before, since ##1 \leqslant k-2 \leqslant k##, using contrapositive of inductive hypothesis

$$ (F_{k-2} \text{ is odd}) \to (3 \nmid k-2)$$

Hence, it must be true that ##3 \nmid (k-2)##. But, as ##3 \mid (k+1)##, I have ## (k+1) = 3 \alpha## and ##(k-2) = 3(\alpha -1)##. This means that ##3 \mid (k-2)##. But this is a contradiction. So, initial assumption that ##F_{k+1}## is odd, is wrong. Hence ##F_{k+1}## is even. This proves the reverse direction. Hence

$$ F_{k+1} \text{ is even} \iff (3 \mid k+1) $$

So, ##P(k+1)## is true. Using strong induction, this means that ##P(n)## is true for all ##n \in \mathbb{N}##.

Is this a correct proof ?
Thanks ##\smile##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok but I got a bit lost in the many cases you considered. You derived the essential formula
$$
F_{k+1}=2F_{k-1}+F_{k-2}
$$
which means that ##F_{k+1}\equiv F_{k-2}\pmod{2}## and ##F_{k-2} \equiv 0 \pmod{2} \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k-2)## by induction hypothesis. Both statements together are
$$
F_{k+1}\equiv F_{k-2}\equiv 0 \pmod{2} \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k-2).
$$
Remains to show that ##3\,|\,(k-2) \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,((k-2)+3) \Longleftrightarrow 3\,|\,(k+1).##

You had all the ingredients. I just cleaned your room a little bit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
I should learn to be more succinct. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gavran
The proof can be get by using ## m = 3n ##, ## m = 3n+1 ## and ## m = 3n+2 ##, where ## n \in \mathbb {N_0} ##.

## m = 3n ##
The base case: ## n = 0 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_0 = 0 ##.
The induction step: Suppose that for ## n = k ##, where ## k \gt 0 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_{3k} ## is even. Now it must be proved that for ## n = k+1 ##, ## F_m = F_{3n} = F_{3(k+1)} ## is even too.

The same approach can be applied for ## m = 3n+1 ## and for ## m = 3n+2 ##, when ## F_m ## are odd numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton
Alternatively, let ##P(n)## be that ##F_{3n}## is even, and ##F_{3n+1}## and ##F_{3n+2}## are odd. Starting with ##n =0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: issacnewton

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K