MHB Prove Inequality w/ Parseval's Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $f: [0, \pi]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ a $C^{\infty}$ function for which the following stands:
$$g(0)=0 \ \ , \ \ g(\pi)=0$$

I have to show that $$\int_0^{\pi}g^2(x)dx \leq \int_0^{\pi}(g'(x))^2dx$$ using Parseval's formula.

I have done the following:

The Fourier series of $g$ is $$g \sim \frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (a_k \cos (kx)+b_k \sin (kx)\right )$$ where $$a_0=\frac{2}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi}g(x)dx \\ a_k=\frac{2}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi}g(x)\cos (kx)dx \ \ , \ \ k=1, 2, \dots \\ b_k=\frac{2}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi}g(x)\sin (kx)dx \ \ , \ \ k=1, 2, \dots $$

From Parseval's formula we have the following:

$$\int_0^{\pi}\left (\frac{a_0}{2}\right )^2dx+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (a_k^2\int_0^{\pi}\cos^2 (kx)dx+b_k^2\int_0^{\pi}\sin^2 (kx)dx\right )=\int_0^{\pi}g^2(x)dx \\ \Rightarrow \int_0^{\pi}g^2(x)dx=\frac{a_0^2}{4}\pi+\frac{\pi}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (a_k^2+b_k^2\right )$$

The Fourier series of $g'$ is $$g'\sim \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (kb_k\cos (kx)-ka_k\sin (kx)\right )$$

From Parseval's formula we have the following:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (k^2b_k^2\int_0^{\pi}\cos^2 (kx)dx+(-k)^2a_k^2\int_0^{\pi}\sin^2 (kx)dx\right )=\int_0^{\pi}(g'(x))^2dx \\ \Rightarrow \int_0^{\pi}(g'(x))^2dx=\frac{\pi}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left (k^2b_k^2+k^2a_k^2\right )$$

Is this correct?? Or have I done something wrong at the application of Parseval's formula??

How could I continue to show the inequality $$\int_0^{\pi}g^2(x)dx \leq \int_0^{\pi}(g'(x))^2dx$$ ?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari!

We want to use the fact that $$g$$ satisfies the boundary conditions:

$$g(0)=g(\pi)=0$$

The way to do this is to note that this b.c. implies $$g$$ can be expressed as a sine series (i.e. we don't need to use any cosine terms). For a reference on this see the Example section in

Sturm–Liouville theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let me know if anything is unclear/not quite right.
 
GJA said:
Hi mathmari!

We want to use the fact that $$g$$ satisfies the boundary conditions:

$$g(0)=g(\pi)=0$$

The way to do this is to note that this b.c. implies $$g$$ can be expressed as a sine series (i.e. we don't need to use any cosine terms). For a reference on this see the Example section in

Sturm–Liouville theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let me know if anything is unclear/not quite right.

Ok... Thank you! (Smile)

- - - Updated - - -

When we have to show with the Parseval's formula an inequality in which case do we have to take an expansion of the function that is involved at the inequality?? (Wondering)
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K