Prove that ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ## and ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving divisibility statements involving powers of 2, specifically that 89 divides \(2^{44}-1\) and 97 divides \(2^{48}-1\). The subject area includes number theory and modular arithmetic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various proofs using modular arithmetic and congruences. Some express discomfort with the clarity of certain steps, particularly the assumptions made about congruences. Others suggest alternative methods or approaches to verify the claims.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different perspectives on the proofs presented. Some have offered alternative approaches and raised questions about the clarity of the original proofs. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the use of calculators to verify steps may detract from the learning experience, indicating a preference for more transparent proofs. There are also mentions of specific congruences that may not be immediately obvious, prompting further examination of the assumptions involved.

Math100
Messages
823
Reaction score
234
Homework Statement
Use the theory of congruences to verify that ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ## and ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

First, consider ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
2^{44}-1&\equiv (2^{11})^{4}-1\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv [(1)^{4}-1]\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv (1-1)\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {89}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Next, consider ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
2^{48}-1&\equiv [(2^{6})^{8}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(-33)^{2}]^{4}-1\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (22^{4}-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(22^{2})^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(-1)^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (1-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {97}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Therefore, ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ## and ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Use the theory of congruences to verify that ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ## and ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

First, consider ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
2^{44}-1&\equiv (2^{11})^{4}-1\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv [(1)^{4}-1]\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv (1-1)\pmod {89}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {89}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Next, consider ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
2^{48}-1&\equiv [(2^{6})^{8}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(-33)^{2}]^{4}-1\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (22^{4}-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(22^{2})^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(-1)^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (1-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {97}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Therefore, ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ## and ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Correct.

But ##2^{11}\equiv 1\pmod{89}\, , \,33^2\equiv 22 \pmod{97}\, , \,22^2\equiv -1 \pmod{97}## isn't obvious. Maybe you should have added some steps there.
 
First, consider ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Then ## 2^{44}-1\equiv (2^{11})^{4}-1\pmod {89} ##.
Note that ## 2^{11}\equiv 1\pmod {89} ##.
Thus ## 2^{44}-1\equiv [(1)^{4}-1]\pmod {89}\equiv (1-1)\pmod {89}\equiv 0\pmod {89} ##.
Therefore, ## 89\mid (2^{44}-1) ##.
Next, consider ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
Then ## 2^{48}-1\equiv [(2^{6})^{8}-1]\pmod {97} ##.
Note that ## 2^{6}\equiv -33\pmod {97}\implies (2^{6})^{8}\equiv (-33)^{8}\pmod {97} ##, ## 33^{2}\equiv 22\pmod {97} ## and ## 22^{2}\equiv -1\pmod {97} ##.
Thus
\begin{align*}
2^{48}-1&\equiv [(-33)^{2}]^{4}-1\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (22^{4}-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(22^{2})^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv [(-1)^{2}-1]\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv (1-1)\pmod {97}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {97}.
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## 97\mid (2^{48}-1) ##.
 
I thought of something like
\begin{align*}
2^{11}&=2048=23\cdot 89 +1\\
33^2&=11^2\cdot 9=121\cdot 9=1089=11\cdot 97 +22\\
22^2&=11^2\cdot 4=121 \cdot 4= 484=4\cdot 97 +96
\end{align*}
In the end, it is only a matter of taste. I just found it uncomfortable that I had to use a calculator to verify your proof. Using the calculator would have allowed me to verify the statement on my own anyway, so where was the advantage to read the proof?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
Another way to approach it is a trick that should always come to mind when even powers occur.

Set ##a=2^{11}=2048## and ##b=2^{6}=64.## Then
\begin{align*}
2^{44}-1&=(a^4-1)=(a^2-1)(a^2+1)\\&=(a-1)(a+1)(a^2+1)\\
&=\underbrace{2,047}_{89\,\mid 23\cdot 89}\cdot \underbrace{2,049}_{89\,\nmid } \cdot \underbrace{4,194,305}_{89\,\nmid }\\
&\\
2^{48}-1&=(b^8-1)=(b^4-1)(b^4+1)=(b^2-1)(b^2+1)(b^4+1)\\&=(b-1)(b+1)(b^2+1)(b^4+1)\\
&=\underbrace{63}_{97\,\nmid}\cdot \underbrace{65}_{97\,\nmid} \cdot \underbrace{4,097}_{97\,\nmid} \cdot \underbrace{16,777,217}_{97\,\mid 172,961\cdot 97}
\end{align*}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
I thought of something like
\begin{align*}
2^{11}&=2048=23\cdot 89 +1\\
33^2&=11^2\cdot 9=121\cdot 9=1089=11\cdot 97 +22\\
22^2&=11^2\cdot 4=121 \cdot 4= 484=4\cdot 97 +96
\end{align*}
In the end, it is only a matter of taste. I just found it uncomfortable that I had to use a calculator to verify your proof. Using the calculator would have allowed me to verify the statement on my own anyway, so where was the advantage to read the proof?
Another way to show ## \,33^2\equiv 22 \pmod{97}## .

##33^2=11\cdot 3\cdot 33=11\cdot 99 ##

Therefore, ## \,33^2\equiv 11\cdot 2 \pmod{97}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and Math100

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K