MHB Proving Independence of Axioms in Game Theory: A Case Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter crobertson0308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Independence
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the independence of four axioms related to game theory. Axiom 1 states that each game involves two distinct teams, while Axiom 2 specifies a minimum of four teams. Axiom 3 asserts that exactly six games are played, and Axiom 4 indicates that each team plays once against the same opponent. The user has established the independence of Axioms 3 and 4 but seeks assistance in justifying Axioms 1 and 2. Additionally, the user is tasked with formulating three theorems derived from these axioms, with one theorem already proposed regarding the number of games played by teams.
crobertson0308
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have four axioms and I am stuck trying to prove the independence of these axioms.

Axiom 1: Each game is played by two distinct teams.
Axiom 2: There are at least four teams.
Axiom 3: Exactly six games are played.
Axiom 4: Each distinct team played once against the same team.

I've justified both Ax 4 and 3 are independent but need help justifying the other two axioms
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Here is a set of models that prove the independence. I leave it to you to verify that each is actually a model.

2csausi.png
 
Would the undefined terms be elements(teams, game)...relation(is, are)?
 
I need to create three theorems that follow from the four axioms. One theorem I came up with was if there are exactly four teams, then each team plays exactly three games. I'm having trouble coming up with another two. The only path I'm seeing is increasing the number of teams and seeing what happens with the models.
 
msalamon said:
I need to create three theorems that follow from the four axioms. One theorem I came up with was if there are exactly four teams, then each team plays exactly three games. I'm having trouble coming up with another two. The only path I'm seeing is increasing the number of teams and seeing what happens with the models.

What did you get as the undefined terms?
 
For the objects: game(s), team(s)
For the relations: is, are, and I wasn't sure of played should be considered a relation or not

- - - Updated - - -

Pardon my typo; of should be if.
 
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
423
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K