Proving Inverse Matrices: Simplifying the Last Step

  • Thread starter Thread starter swuster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrices
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
swuster
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show that a given matrix is the inverse of the other, by showing that multiplying them together generates the identity matrix. I can't see a way to simplify the last step and I feel like I'm missing something..? Any input on this would be helpful. Thanks!

Homework Equations


see below
j = sqrt(-1)

The Attempt at a Solution


ece2200.jpg

How do I prove that the rest of the terms are 0?
 

Attachments

  • ece2200.jpg
    ece2200.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 488
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not cut off. It's as far as I have gotten with the proof, haha. There is nothing obvious that jumps out at me when I consider the case where the exponential argument isn't 0.
 
Thanks so much! That did the trick!

finishedproof.jpg
 
swuster said:
Thanks so much! That did the trick!

finishedproof.jpg

Looks good, nice job.

It's also insightful to consider what is going on geometrically.

This sum:

[tex]\sum_{i=0}^{M-1}\frac{1}{M}e^{j\left(\frac{2\pi(\lambda-\kappa)i}{M}\right)[/tex]

is calculating the average of [itex]M[/itex] complex numbers. Furthermore, since [itex]\lambda - \kappa[/itex] is a nonzero integer, these complex numbers are evenly spaced samples around the unit circle, so their average is zero.