MHB Proving Inverse of 1-1 Function $f$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Inverse
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Wave)

Could you give me a hint how I could show that if $f$ is a function, that is $1-1$, then, it stands that:

$$(\forall x \in dom(f)) f^{-1}(f(x))=x$$

? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hi! (Wave)

Could you give me a hint how I could show that if $f$ is a function, that is $1-1$, then, it stands that:

$$(\forall x \in dom(f)) f^{-1}(f(x))=x$$

? (Thinking)

Firstly, there is a problem with your statement as such.

Note that $f^{-1}(y)$ is a subset of the domain of $f$ whenever $y$ is in the target of $f$. So what you intend to write is this:

$$(\forall x\in \text{dom}f)\ f^{-1}(f(x))=\{x\}$$

Now. Assume that there is some pesky $x$ in the domain of $f$ such that $f^{-1}(f(x))=S\neq \{x\}$.

Note that $x$ is clearly in $S$.

By assumption, there exists $x'\in S$ such that $x'\neq x$. But then $f(x')=f(x)$ where $x'\neq x$. So $f$ is not $1$-$1$.

This is merely language. If you find this cryptic, try thinking what a $1$-$1$ looks like in terms of pictures. Make the domain a a "bubble" and put a few dots in it. Do the same for the target. From here it should be intuitively clear what's happening.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top