Quantum Computing: Are D-Wave's Adiabatic Quantum Computers Effective?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of D-Wave's adiabatic quantum computers, exploring the current status of quantum computing technology, the claims made by D-Wave, and the challenges associated with quantum computing, particularly decoherence and the limitations of adiabatic quantum computing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the effectiveness of D-Wave's claims regarding their quantum computer, suggesting skepticism about its operational status and the validity of its technology.
  • Others note that D-Wave utilizes adiabatic quantum computing, which is easier to implement than traditional quantum computing but is limited to specific types of problems.
  • There are assertions that D-Wave holds numerous patents, indicating a level of innovation, though some participants express reluctance to collaborate with the company due to its patenting practices.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical utility of adiabatic quantum computing, with some arguing that it may not provide significant advantages over classical computing methods.
  • Participants discuss the physical setup of D-Wave's quantum computer, including the use of a dilution refrigerator and the materials involved in its construction, suggesting that the technology is based on established principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some skeptical of D-Wave's claims while others defend the company's technology and its potential applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical benefits of adiabatic quantum computing compared to classical methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific problem types for adiabatic quantum computing and the ongoing debate about its practical advantages over conventional computing. There is also uncertainty regarding the actual capabilities of D-Wave's technology.

delta_simon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What is the status of current quantum computers?
I mean, are there any working examples?
What can they calculate so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer

In particular, check out the timeline of quantum computing.

Qubits have been stored, meaning the most basic elements of a register are there. As I understand it, decoherence (interaction with the macro environment) is the biggest challenge right now.

One company, D-Wave, claims to have a working quantum computer but no one seriously believes this. If they have any real breakthrough technology, they would have applied for patents and, by now, the applications would be public, so it's a pretty good bet they're full of $!&%.
 
One company, D-Wave, claims to have a working quantum computer but no one seriously believes this.
They have a sealed box that they claim contains a quantum computer - you can't open the box because you might collapse it.
 
Well, D-Wave is actually NOT claiming to have a "generic" quantum computer. Nowadays they are using what is known as adiabatic quantum computing which is much easier to implement than ordinary QC because you only need next nearest neighbor coupling (the quibts are connected in a 2D "lattice") and you do not really need to manipulate individual qubits during the computation (the idea is to initialize the lattice in the right way, and then adiabatically transform the Hamiltonian to the system you are actually interested in).
This is why they can connect so many qubits at once.
The drawback of adiabatic QC is that it can only be used for a few problems, you can't e.g. use it to factorize or sort.

And I can assure you that D-Wave have MANY patents. They insist on patenting just about everything they do which is one (of many) reason why most people in academia (including me, and I am speaking from experience) do not want to work with them (which is a shame really, because they have some really talented people working for them).

The "sealed box" is as far as I know a dilution refrigerator operated at about 50 mK immersed in a liquid He cryostat. So there is a very good reason why you can't open it:cool:
However, the actual QC is just Nb structures (Josephson junctions, resistors, capacitors +transmission lines for biasing) on a chip. As far as I remember it was fabricated by JPL using their standard RSFQ fab process. There are some micrographs in their papers.

Anyway, the point is that at there is -at least at the moment- no real reason to believe that they are actually lying about anything. The big question is instead whether or not they are doing anything really useful, adibatic QC har always been a somewhat controversial idea and many people claim that adibatic QC will never have any real practical benefits over conventional computers (adibatic QC might turn out to be too slow).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K