Quantum Experiment: Results & Observer Impact?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert George
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the impact of observation in quantum experiments, specifically the double-slit experiment. Participants debate whether the act of observing alters the outcome of the experiment, with references to Michio Kaku's demonstrations using lasers and dust particles. The consensus indicates that observing the path of particles leads to particle-like behavior, while unobserved particles create an interference pattern, demonstrating wave-like behavior. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of the observer effect in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the double-slit experiment
  • Knowledge of wave-particle duality
  • Basic concepts of photon behavior and detection methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the double-slit experiment and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the observer effect in quantum physics
  • Study Michio Kaku's interpretations and demonstrations of quantum phenomena
  • Investigate the role of measurement in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the implications of observation in quantum experiments.

Albert George
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
During a quantum experiment there is an observer and you get a result. You perform the same experiment without an observer and get another result. Is this true?

The link below is very good at explaining, it's animated too but that's good, it is fun to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc"

Again, can an observer by observing change the outcome of the experiment or not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, this video is from a very dubious movie.

To address your question, say you put a photographic film as the detector screen, but you don't observe the result. Do you think it makes any difference in the result you see on the film just because you observe it later?

What you are confusing with, I think, is an observer or the ability to observe of the exact path through the double slit. This is a different question than what you asked. I would suggest that you browse through the various threads in here because this issue has been discussed ad nauseum.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Unfortunately, this video is from a very dubious movie.
Okay but it is a good illustration.

ZapperZ said:
To address your question, say you put a photographic film as the detector screen, but you don't observe the result. Do you think it makes any difference in the result you see on the film just because you observe it later?

That is not what I meant. I mean that you observe the slits, what is happening to the electron? You shoot one at a time. You saw in the movie, shoot one at a time and you get an interference pattern but if you observe what is happening at the slits then it behaves like a particle.


ZapperZ said:
What you are confusing with, I think, is an observer or the ability to observe of the exact path through the double slit. This is a different question than what you asked. I would suggest that you browse through the various threads in here because this issue has been discussed ad nauseum.

Zz.

That's right, sorry for me confusing you. I have read about this and seen different movies. Maybe you have heard of the theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. He showed this experiment once. He used a laser. He took dust, or something resembling to dust, and powdered the air, don't know how to say it.
Anyway, it showed that before the slits the photons behaved as particles and after the slit it behaved as waves. How did he know that? The dust in the air made it possible so see the laser beam before the slits but not after. We can't see waves of light and the pattern was an interference pattern.

I will search on the forum about this. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K