Quantum Mechanics Prior To The Big Bang

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Quantum Mechanics to the universe prior to the Big Bang, highlighting the challenges posed by current theories of quantum gravity. Participants assert that existing frameworks fail under high spacetime curvature, necessitating new approaches such as Effective Field Theory and renormalization. The concept of eternal inflation and quantum fluctuations of the inflation field are also referenced as potential areas of exploration. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the speculative nature of theories regarding pre-Big Bang conditions due to the lack of testable predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Quantum Gravity concepts
  • Knowledge of Effective Field Theory and renormalization
  • Awareness of the Many-Worlds interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Effective Field Theory and its applications in Quantum Gravity
  • Explore the concept of eternal inflation and its implications
  • Study the role of quantum fluctuations in cosmological models
  • Investigate the limitations of Quantum Electrodynamics in high-energy scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the intersection of Quantum Mechanics and cosmology, particularly regarding the conditions before the Big Bang.

Dryson
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Are we able to apply Quantum Mechanics to a Universe Prior to the Big Bang? Or would such mechanics require an entirely new set of formulas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would a universe even exist prior to the Big Bang? (Maybe so in a Many-World's interpretation of QM, but not sure.)
 
Dryson said:
Are we able to apply Quantum Mechanics to a Universe Prior to the Big Bang? Or would such mechanics require an entirely new set of formulas?

Since there is no testable theory that posits a time before the big bang, you can pretty much make up whatever answer you like, since it can't be tested. Of course, it isn't physics, but ...
 
At present, we don't even know if we can apply quantum mechanics very near the big bang, because our current theory of quantum gravity fails when the spacetime curvature is very high. You can ask in the BTSM forum about the LQC bounce if you like.
 
quantum gravity fails when the spacetime curvature is very high

How does Quantum Gravity fail when spacetime curvature is very high? It sounds to me like a plane that is flying straight up and then stalls.
 
Dryson said:
quantum gravity fails when the spacetime curvature is very high

How does Quantum Gravity fail when spacetime curvature is very high? It sounds to me like a plane that is flying straight up and then stalls.

The failure is pretty much the same as that of quantum electrodynamics. For quantum gravity and quantum electrodynamics to make sense, as we currently understand them, we need to do something equivalent to putting the theory in a large but finite box, and finely discretizing the theory. We only do experiments at very low energies and long wavelengths compared to the discretization, so the discretization doesn't matter, and the theories make good predictions. However, since the theories are discretized, this means they don't make sense if we probe very finely, ie. if we can probe very high energies or high curvatures.
 
Dryson said:
How does Quantum Gravity fail when spacetime curvature is very high? It sounds to me like a plane that is flying straight up and then stalls.

Its because of the infinities that plague Quantum Field Theory in general.

To tame those something called Effective Field Theory is required - at least that's the modern view the great physicist Wilson got a Nobel prize for sorting out - its an outgrowth of trying to understand what is called renormalisation. That paradigm is the best way to view quantum gravity:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3511

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
874
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
909
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K