Quantum wavelength of gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of the quantum wavelength of gravitation and the potential for a quantum theory of gravity. Participants explore the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, the implications of gravitational waves, and the challenges of integrating these two fundamental theories of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether it makes sense to discuss the quantum wavelength of gravitation and if a quantitative determination is possible.
  • Others note that gravitational waves were observed in 2016, suggesting that quantum effects do not play a role in this phenomenon.
  • There is a discussion about the urgency of developing a quantum theory of gravity, with some arguing that it is important due to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity in extreme conditions.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of quantum effects in gravity, while others argue that a theory of quantum gravity would extend the standard model of particle physics.
  • Participants highlight the significance of finding a unified theory that addresses both gravitational and quantum effects, suggesting it could lead to profound insights in physics.
  • One participant reflects on the historical context of unifications in physics, comparing the potential discoveries from a theory of quantum gravity to past breakthroughs in electromagnetism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of a quantum theory of gravity but express differing views on the urgency and feasibility of achieving such a theory. There is no consensus on the existence of quantum effects in gravity or the implications of current theories.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of experimental evidence for quantum effects in gravity and the unresolved nature of how gravity fits within the standard model of particle physics. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the urgency surrounding the development of a quantum theory of gravity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying theoretical physics, particularly in the fields of quantum mechanics and general relativity, as well as individuals curious about the ongoing challenges in unifying these fundamental theories.

south
Messages
91
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
I put the question here because I don't know where the best place is. If it is misplaced, I beg your pardon and correction.

Quantized phenomena operate with a determined or determinable wavelength. My question refers to the quantization of gravity.
Does it make sense to ask what the quantum wavelength of gravitation is? If it does make sense, is an explicit and quantitative determination possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational wave was observed in 2016 as predicted by GR. But quantum plays no role there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: south
Thanks for answer.
1. How can I find an article referring to the observation made in 2016?
2. Should I discard the idea of quantum gravity?
 
south said:
2. Should I discard the idea of quantum gravity?
Well, there's a Nobel Prize in it for you if you can figure out a valid theory of Quantum Gravity.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and south
south said:
. How can I find an article referring to the observation made in 2016?
Google "LIGO"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: south
Thanks phinds.

1. I deduce from this that there is nothing quantum in gravity, nor can there be anything quantum as long as the standard model remains in force.
2. Why then is there this urgency to achieve a quantum theory of gravity?
 
south said:
2. Why then is there this urgency to achieve a quantum theory of gravity?
Quantum Theory and Relativity are the two main theories of modern physics, and they are not entirely compatible where they are simultaneously relevant. Finding a consistent theory combining the two is the "holy grail" of modern physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, Demystifier and south
south said:
I deduce from this that there is nothing quantum in gravity,
Not quite. We have never detected any quantum effects of gravity, but we don't expect them to be visible in the experiments we can do at the moment so this is no great surprise.
south said:
nor can there be anything quantum as long as the standard model remains in force.
No. It is true that the standard model of particle physics does not include gravity, but this is just because we don't knowhow it fits in. A working theory of quantum gravity would be expected to extend the standard model to include it.
south said:
Why then is there this urgency to achieve a quantum theory of gravity?
I don't think there is any urgency in the sense that it would solve any immediate practical problems. In the sense that everybody wants to be first to do it, maybe.

We need a theory of gravity that can deal with quantum sources of gravity and doesn't break down in extremely strong fields. That's the obvious hole in our fundamental physics knowledge, which is why people are interested in it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, FactChecker and south
south said:
Why then is there this urgency to achieve a quantum theory of gravity?
It's not so much urgent as it is important, perhaps the single most important unanswered question around these days. Quantum mechanics is a powerful and successful theory that works really well everywhere except in the presence of extreme gravitational affects; general relativity is a powerful and successful theory that works really well everywhere except in the presence of extreme quantum affects; but neither works well when both gravitational and quantum effects are involved. That's a frustrating hole in both theories and suggests that we will learn something amazing about both gravity and quantum physics when we find a theory that fills that hole.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and south
  • #10
I would say it is compelling. We have seen wonders emerge from the other great unifications of physical understanding: the theory of electro-magnetism being perhaps the most astonishingly fecund. What marvels may be lurking just behind this veil?

.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, FactChecker and south
  • #11
Nugatory said:
It's not so much urgent as it is important, perhaps the single most important unanswered question around these days. Quantum mechanics is a powerful and successful theory that works really well everywhere except in the presence of extreme gravitational affects; general relativity is a powerful and successful theory that works really well everywhere except in the presence of extreme quantum affects; but neither works well when both gravitational and quantum effects are involved. That's a frustrating hole in both theories and suggests that we will learn something amazing about both gravity and quantum physics when we find a theory that fills that hole.
Thanks Nugatory. I liked what you expressed regarding urgency vs. importance.---------Of all the details in physics to snoop around, I had the bad luck of choosing one like this. Next time I'll try another one. Kind regards.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
  • #12
The conversation has become extensive and I want to thank those who have helped me so far:

anuttarasammyak,
phinds,
FactChecker,
Ibix,
Nugatory,
hutchphd

Thanks to each and every one of you. Happy New Year.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory, anuttarasammyak, Ibix and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K