Question about a Riccati type diff eq.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kenano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq Type
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a Riccati type differential equation, specifically examining the necessity of a particular solution and the transformation of the Riccati equation into a second-order linear ordinary differential equation (ODE). Participants explore the implications of their findings on the existence of particular solutions and the constants involved in the solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a Riccati equation and proposes a particular solution, questioning the validity of the general solution derived.
  • Another participant argues that a particular solution is not necessarily required to solve a Riccati equation, suggesting a transformation to a second-order linear ODE instead.
  • Questions arise regarding the determination of constants in the solution to the first-order equation, particularly in the context of boundary value problems.
  • There is a discussion about whether the particular solution can be considered singular, with differing views on its validity.
  • A participant explains the method used to solve the intermediate second-order ODE without series expansion, detailing the characteristic equation and its roots.
  • A later reply clarifies that the transformation of the Riccati equation is valid under certain conditions and highlights the utility of classical methods for solving the resulting linear ODE.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a particular solution and the implications of the general solution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of the particular solution and the determination of constants in boundary value problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the Riccati equation and the conditions under which transformations are applicable. There are unresolved questions about the assumptions made in the derivation of solutions and the nature of singular solutions.

kenano
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[tex]\acute{y} = \frac{1}{t^{2}} -\frac{y}{t} - y^{2}[/tex]

To solve a Riccati type diff eq a particular solution is needed. In our case it is: [tex]y_{1} = -\frac{1}{t}[/tex]

By setting
[tex]y= y_{1}+\frac{1}{u}= -\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u}[/tex]

and differentiating this
[tex]\acute{y}= \frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{u'}{u^{2}}[/tex]

Substituting for y and y' in the first original equation:
[tex]\frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{u'}{u^{2}}= \frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{1}{t}(-\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u})-(-\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u})^{2}[/tex]

This yields the general solution:
[tex]y= -\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{\frac{t}{2}+\frac{K}{t}}[/tex]

(K being a constant)

But, according to the general solution above, it isn't possible to have a particular solution:
[tex]y_{1}= -\frac{1}{t}[/tex]
since we can't have the second term at the right-hand side zero.

So, am i missing something?

Thanks for help in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve a Riccati type diff eq a particular solution is needed
Not necessarily.
Often it is easier to transform the Riccati ODE into a second order linear ODE which can be solved without knowing a particular solution.
 

Attachments

  • RiccatiODE.JPG
    RiccatiODE.JPG
    13.8 KB · Views: 467
Thank you for your answer Jacquelin. I still have some questions.

-We have two constants in the solution to a first order equation because of the intermediate second order diff eq. But the original eq is a first order one. Then how could the second constant be determined in a boundary value problem? Or one of them is zero automatically?
-It seems that we still cannot have the particular solution y1=-1/t according to new solution. Does it mean it is a singular solution?
-How did you solve the intermediate second order diff eq with variable coefficients without series expansion?
 
We have two constants in the solution to a first order equation because of the intermediate second order diff eq. But the original eq is a first order one. Then how could the second constant be determined in a boundary value problem? Or one of them is zero automatically?
In fact there is only one constant in the solution (due to the proportional relationship y=f'/f )
Let c=c1/c2 and rewrite the general solution as :
y = (c t²-1)/(t(c t²+1))

It seems that we still cannot have the particular solution y1=-1/t according to new solution. Does it mean it is a singular solution?
No, we can have the solution y1=-1/t . It corresponds to the case of c=0.

How did you solve the intermediate second order diff eq with variable coefficients without series expansion?

The intermediate linear second order ODE f''+(1/t)f'-(1/t²)f=0 is homogeneous. So, referring to the usual method, the characteristic equation corresponding to solutions of the form t^k is :
k(k-1)+k-1=0 which roots are k=1 and k=-1 so, the solution of the ODE is :
f = c1 t + c2 / t
 
Now it's all clear. Thank you very much.
 
This was a particular case of Riccati equation.
The general Riccati ODE :
y'' = p(x) + q(x) y + r(x) y²
is tansformed into a second order linear ODE by :
y = -(1/r) f ' / f
where f(x) is the unknown function.

Of course, this transformation has interest only if the second order linear ODE is easy to solve directly, thanks to convenient classical methods : a lot have known solutions with elementary functions or with well-known special functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K