Question about animals' change of number of legs when they grow

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14159253589
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animals Change
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a question from a science exam regarding the classification of organisms in a pond, specifically whether there are at least six different populations based on the provided data about plants and animals. The scope includes conceptual clarification and debate over the definitions of terms used in the question.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that the conclusion of at least six different populations is incorrect, citing that the data does not support such a claim due to the developmental changes in animals like tadpoles.
  • Another participant challenges the use of the term "population," stating it is defined for groups of individuals of the same species, suggesting that the question may be flawed.
  • A different participant expresses confusion over the wording of the question, noting inconsistencies in the data regarding submerged and floating plants, which may affect interpretations of species diversity.
  • Another participant reiterates that the term "population" does not apply in this context, comparing it to herds of cows, and emphasizes that the question cannot be definitively answered with the given information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the question is flawed or poorly worded, and there is no consensus on whether the claim of six populations can be substantiated based on the data provided.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the definitions of "population" and the interpretation of the data regarding plant and animal counts, as well as the potential for ambiguity in the question's wording.

3.14159253589
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I recently had a science exam and there is one question I would like to know about.

Question: Some students noted the number of organisms living in a pond. The table below shows the number of plants and animals:

Plants

Position in pond Number of plants

Fully Submerged: 124

Partially Submerged: 186

Floating: 203

Legs

Animals

Legs Number of Animals

With no legs: 44

With legs: 36



One of the students commented that there are at least 6 different populations living in the pond. Is he correct?

(a) Correct
(b) Incorrect

My answer was that he is incorrect since it is not possible to make such a conclusion from the data given as some animals like the tadpole have legs when they are adult frogs but not when they are younger. Also, slightly older tadpoles have legs while newborn ones don't.

However, I was marked wrong and I would like to confirm here whether I am correct. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3.14159253589 said:
One of the students commented that there are at least 6 different populations living in the pond. Is he correct?

In such a scenario, the usage of the word 'population' is incorrect since it is defined for a group of individuals that belong to the same species. Are you sure that this was the exact question?
 
mishrashubham said:
In such a scenario, the usage of the word 'population' is incorrect since it is defined for a group of individuals that belong to the same species. Are you sure that this was the exact question?

Yes. That is what they meant. They are asking whether the statement is true or false.
 
Perhaps I am missing something, but for me it is either poorly worded, or poorly thought problem. Every floating plant I can imagine is partially submerged, yet number of partially submerged plants is lower than the number of floating plants.

My guess is that it is the differences in numbers of plants that lead to the conclusion that there are at least 4 different species of plants in the pond. There are 203-186 plants that are floating without submerging, perhaps someone thought these are different from all other floating plants (or some similar way of thinking). But I don't think this conclusion was correct.
 
The term population does not make sense here. If we had a field and in it were 6 herds of cows they would each be a population however there is still one species in the field.

If that is the question then it is flawed, you cannot answer A or B. From the data we can neither say yes or no.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
6K