MHB Question about anti-matter colliding with matter

  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anti-matter Matter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between matter and antimatter, particularly in the context of the universe's formation. Initially, equal amounts of matter and antimatter were created, but the universe is now predominantly matter. The conversation explores the annihilation of matter and antimatter, which releases energy, and questions whether this process violates the law of conservation in a closed system. It is clarified that energy is not lost; it can be converted back into particle-antiparticle pairs continuously. The discussion delves into particle physics, specifically the behavior of kaons, which exhibit parity violation and contribute to a slight excess of matter over antimatter in the early universe. This phenomenon helps explain the current matter-antimatter imbalance, suggesting that a small amount of matter emerged from the interactions of particles in the early universe.
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I was watching this YouTube video regarding the formation of our universe (around 20:09 minutes) and they were talking about antimatter and matter. When anti matter comes into contact with normal matter they obliterate each other and a large amount of energy is released. When our universe was created there were initially equal amounts of antimatter and normal matter but somehow we are lop sided towards the matter. In the checkers analogy used in the video they say it's like our entire universe is like the one checker that is remaining at the end of the game.What I don't understand is, when antimatter and matter destroy each other a large amount of energy is released. According to Einstein's equation E=mc^2 energy can be converted into matter. So even if all matter and antimatter collide and everything becomes energy, it's not like anything's "lost" and all that energy could be converted back into matter right?

If the answer is "no" and something is permanently lost, than does this disprove the law of conservation in a closed system (i.e. the universe)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: question about anti matter coliding with matter

find_the_fun said:
I was watching this YouTube video regarding the formation of our universe (around 20:09 minutes) and they were talking about antimatter and matter. When anti matter comes into contact with normal matter they obliterate each other and a large amount of energy is released. When our universe was created there were initially equal amounts of antimatter and normal matter but somehow we are lop sided towards the matter. In the checkers analogy used in the video they say it's like our entire universe is like the one checker that is remaining at the end of the game.What I don't understand is, when antimatter and matter destroy each other a large amount of energy is released. According to Einstein's equation E=mc^2 energy can be converted into matter. So even if all matter and antimatter collide and everything becomes energy, it's not like anything's "lost" and all that energy could be converted back into matter right?

That is right, nothing is lost. In fact energy is being turned back into particle/anti-particle pairs all of the time.
CB
 
Re: question about anti matter coliding with matter

find_the_fun said:
I was watching this YouTube video regarding the formation of our universe (around 20:09 minutes) and they were talking about antimatter and matter. When anti matter comes into contact with normal matter they obliterate each other and a large amount of energy is released. When our universe was created there were initially equal amounts of antimatter and normal matter but somehow we are lop sided towards the matter. In the checkers analogy used in the video they say it's like our entire universe is like the one checker that is remaining at the end of the game.What I don't understand is, when antimatter and matter destroy each other a large amount of energy is released. According to Einstein's equation E=mc^2 energy can be converted into matter. So even if all matter and antimatter collide and everything becomes energy, it's not like anything's "lost" and all that energy could be converted back into matter right?

If the answer is "no" and something is permanently lost, than does this disprove the law of conservation in a closed system (i.e. the universe)?
This goes kindof deep in particle physics.

There is a particle called a kaon made of a strange quark and an up quark. It is the K+ and K- is its anti-particle. (We can do this with bottom quarks just as well.)

The neat thing about particle is that the way it decays violates something called "parity." Simply speaking parity conservation means you could replace a function f(x) to be the same as the function f(-x). (Of course you need this to happen in three D.)

Why do we care? Well you can combine the K+ and K- states and create what are called the long and short Kaons and both have a charge of 0.

The short (lived) kaons decay into into two pions and the long (lived) kaons decay into three pions. One would expect that these particles are completely distinct...sort of like two orthogonal vectors. But it isn't that simple. With parity violation some weird things happen. For example, the short kaons will occasionally decay into three pions. Which should not happen...but it does.

So where does that lead us? Well, looking at the pion decay states we note that the short kaons can produce a small amount of matter over antimatter. "Summing" this up over the whole of the early Universe we get that there were 1 billion particle-antiparticle states creating nothing but a radiation field, along with one lonely particle of matter. Matter over antimatter. Voila!

-Dan
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top