Question about APS DNP fall meeting

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on submitting an abstract for the APS DNP meeting, with a focus on choosing between a standard category and a Mini-Symposium. Key points include clarification that the event is specifically the "2021 DNP Meeting," not the broader "APS Fall Meeting." The distinction between the two categories is not clearly defined, but it is suggested that contacting the program committee for guidance is advisable. Acceptance rates for abstracts are estimated to be between 20-40%. Additionally, it is noted that this may not be the ideal first conference experience for someone currently in a PhD program, and seeking advice from an advisor is recommended.
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I would like to submit an abstract to the APS DNP meeting this fall and I need to choose a category for my talk. I see that they have a series of Mini-Symposiums and my talk would fit both in a non-Mini-Symposiums but also in a Mini-Symposium (it seems like Mini-Symposiums overlap a lot with the other categories). What is the difference between a normal category and a Mini-Symposium category? Is one more important than the other? Is the acceptance rate different? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, this isn't the "APS Fall Meeting". It's the "2021 DNP Meeting". Only DNP will be there, not the whole APS.

Second, if you have questions on where your abstract best belongs, you should contact the program committee. It's their job to take care of such things.

Finally, I gather than this is your first time at DNP and the first talk you are trying to give at a conference. This may not the best place to start. Acceptance rates are probably in the 20-40% ballpark. Your profile says you are in the midst of a PhD program. Your advisor may be a better resource for this.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top