Question about APS DNP fall meeting

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on submitting an abstract for the APS DNP meeting, with a focus on choosing between a standard category and a Mini-Symposium. Key points include clarification that the event is specifically the "2021 DNP Meeting," not the broader "APS Fall Meeting." The distinction between the two categories is not clearly defined, but it is suggested that contacting the program committee for guidance is advisable. Acceptance rates for abstracts are estimated to be between 20-40%. Additionally, it is noted that this may not be the ideal first conference experience for someone currently in a PhD program, and seeking advice from an advisor is recommended.
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I would like to submit an abstract to the APS DNP meeting this fall and I need to choose a category for my talk. I see that they have a series of Mini-Symposiums and my talk would fit both in a non-Mini-Symposiums but also in a Mini-Symposium (it seems like Mini-Symposiums overlap a lot with the other categories). What is the difference between a normal category and a Mini-Symposium category? Is one more important than the other? Is the acceptance rate different? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, this isn't the "APS Fall Meeting". It's the "2021 DNP Meeting". Only DNP will be there, not the whole APS.

Second, if you have questions on where your abstract best belongs, you should contact the program committee. It's their job to take care of such things.

Finally, I gather than this is your first time at DNP and the first talk you are trying to give at a conference. This may not the best place to start. Acceptance rates are probably in the 20-40% ballpark. Your profile says you are in the midst of a PhD program. Your advisor may be a better resource for this.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top