Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question about extreemly large black holes.

  1. Dec 29, 2013 #1
    If we define the density of a black hole to be it's mass divided by the volume within it's event horizon then as the mass of a black hole increases it's density decreases. At some point the density would be equal to the ambient mass density of the universe. Can we correctly consider ourselves to be in such a black hole? Or is there a balance point where gravitation is balanced by cosmological expansion that represents a theoretical upper limit to the size of a black hole?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 29, 2013 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

  4. Dec 30, 2013 #3

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Density is not a useful way of looking at event horizons. The mass density inside the event horizon can be naively approximated this way using the Schwarzschild metric, but, you will get a nonsensical answer. Spacetime geometry is obviously non-euclidean in the presence of extreme mass density. Otherwise, any neutron star in excess of about .25 solar masses should be a black hole. If you apply the Tolman [TOV] limit to account for spacetime curvature it increases to around 3 solar masses.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Question about extreemly large black holes.
Loading...