Questions About Black Holes & Event Horizons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, event horizons, and the effects of gravitational fields on observers. Participants explore concepts related to time dilation, the visibility of matter near black holes, and the theoretical implications of singularities and white holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an observer watching another observer fall into a black hole would see them appear to freeze at the event horizon due to time dilation effects.
  • Questions are raised about whether a powerful telescope could reveal matter frozen at the event horizon, with some suggesting that it would appear so to an outside observer.
  • Concerns are expressed about the implications of a star collapsing into a black hole, with some arguing that it may seem to an outside observer that the black hole never fully forms.
  • Participants discuss the immense gravitational pull of black holes and the potential for objects to be torn apart as they approach.
  • There is speculation about the experience of reaching a singularity and whether the laws of physics would remain consistent in such an extreme environment.
  • Some participants introduce the concept of white holes as theoretical opposites of black holes, though there is contention regarding their existence and nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the visibility of matter near black holes, the nature of time dilation, and the existence of white holes. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about observational capabilities, the dependence on theoretical models of black holes and white holes, and unresolved questions regarding the effects of extreme gravitational fields on physical laws.

Charlie G
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I read that if an observer were to watch as another observer fell into the black hole, eventually observer A would see B stop before reaching the event horizon. I'm having a little trouble with this and have to questions about it.

1)If we turned an extremely powerful telescope at a black hole, would we see all the matter that the black hole has pulled in frozen at the event horizon?

2)When a star is collapsing to form a black hole, after enough mass has been compacted and a black hole has formed, then shouldn't what's left of the collapsing mass be frozen outside of the event horizon again? Making it seem as though it never colllapsed completely into a black hole, to an observer outside the event horizon?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Charlie G said:
I read that if an observer were to watch as another observer fell into the black hole, eventually observer A would see B stop before reaching the event horizon. I'm having a little trouble with this and have to questions about it.

1)If we turned an extremely powerful telescope at a black hole, would we see all the matter that the black hole has pulled in frozen at the event horizon?

2)When a star is collapsing to form a black hole, after enough mass has been compacted and a black hole has formed, then shouldn't what's left of the collapsing mass be frozen outside of the event horizon again? Making it seem as though it never colllapsed completely into a black hole, to an observer outside the event horizon?

The answer to both questions is yes. In fact (second question) to the outside observer the black hole never forms. However, the stuff that appears frozen will disappear from view over time, since there will be continual red shifting of the light from the stuff at the black hole.
 
The observer that is being pulled into the black hole is a subject of time dilation due to the enormous gravitational field, it is possible to view this with a powerful telescope.
 
Wow, that's pretty sweet. If you could somehow survive a journey to a singularity, I wonder what it would be like. With infinite curving of spacetime, ignoring that you couldn't possibly move, would the laws of physics work the same?
 
The powerful gravitational pull of a black hole is immense and will pull apart anything close enough.

The time distortion is only a matter of perspective; Imagine yourself and me sitting in a spacecraft and you are at safe distance and you have entered a stable orbit around the black hole. I go jump into the black hole, you can see me getting close and close to the singularity and then suddenly freeze, in my perspective, I would be ripped apart by the immense gravitation, but you will see me frozen for all eternity.

No one really knows what happens if you manage to survive the entry into the singularity, but some physicists have theorized that there is something called a "white hole". These white holes are the opposite of black holes; instead of pulling you towards it, it will throw you out of it. Think of three magnets, two are positive and one is negative, you are a positive magnet, the black hole is a negative magnet and the white hole is a positive magnet. The black hole will pull you through, just like two magnets with the opposite attraction would pull towards each other, the white hole would do exactly what two magnets of the same polarity would; they would try to get away from each other.
 
Charlie G said:
Wow, that's pretty sweet. If you could somehow survive a journey to a singularity, I wonder what it would be like. With infinite curving of spacetime, ignoring that you couldn't possibly move, would the laws of physics work the same?

First, black holes do not curve spoace/time. In fact, they do not tap into, or reshape the space/time. This is so because: black holes are oney way, meaning they only swallow matter into their core. They do not send the matter to some other point in space. To see why go to my post: why white holes do not exist. (In the astrophysics ssection.)
 
Division said:
The powerful gravitational pull of a black hole is immense and will pull apart anything close enough.

The time distortion is only a matter of perspective; Imagine yourself and me sitting in a spacecraft and you are at safe distance and you have entered a stable orbit around the black hole. I go jump into the black hole, you can see me getting close and close to the singularity and then suddenly freeze, in my perspective, I would be ripped apart by the immense gravitation, but you will see me frozen for all eternity.

No one really knows what happens if you manage to survive the entry into the singularity, but some physicists have theorized that there is something called a "white hole". These white holes are the opposite of black holes; instead of pulling you towards it, it will throw you out of it. Think of three magnets, two are positive and one is negative, you are a positive magnet, the black hole is a negative magnet and the white hole is a positive magnet. The black hole will pull you through, just like two magnets with the opposite attraction would pull towards each other, the white hole would do exactly what two magnets of the same polarity would; they would try to get away from each other.

White holes do not exist, they never have, they never will. To see why not go to my post. (As said in my previous reply.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K